166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10998614)
1. Gait analysis and energy consumption of below-knee amputees wearing three different prosthetic feet.
Huang GF; Chou YL; Su FC
Gait Posture; 2000 Oct; 12(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 10998614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet.
Czerniecki JM; Gitter A; Munro C
J Biomech; 1991; 24(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 2026634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet.
Torburn L; Powers CM; Guiterrez R; Perry J
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1995 May; 32(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 7562650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gait patterns of transtibial amputee patients walking indoors barefoot.
Han TR; Chung SG; Shin HI
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Feb; 82(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 12544754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of mechanical and metabolic factors in the gait of congenital below knee amputees. A comparison of the SACH and Seattle feet.
Colborne GR; Naumann S; Longmuir PE; Berbrayer D
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Oct; 71(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 1388973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the International Committee of the Red Cross foot with the solid ankle cushion heel foot during gait: a randomized double-blind study.
Turcot K; Sagawa Y; Lacraz A; Lenoir J; Assal M; Armand S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1490-7. PubMed ID: 23578592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamics of below-knee child amputee gait: SACH foot versus Flex foot.
Schneider K; Hart T; Zernicke RF; Setoguchi Y; Oppenheim W
J Biomech; 1993 Oct; 26(10):1191-204. PubMed ID: 8253824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations.
Powers CM; Torburn L; Perry J; Ayyappa E
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Jul; 75(7):825-9. PubMed ID: 8024435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical analysis of the influence of prosthetic feet on below-knee amputee walking.
Gitter A; Czerniecki JM; DeGroot DM
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1991 Jun; 70(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 2039616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Energy costs and performance of transfemoral amputees and non-amputees during walking and running: A pilot study.
Mengelkoch LJ; Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):484-491. PubMed ID: 27885098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Energy costs & performance of transtibial amputees & non-amputees during walking & running.
Mengelkoch LJ; Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
Int J Sports Med; 2014 Dec; 35(14):1223-8. PubMed ID: 25144429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Segment velocities in normal and transtibial amputees: prosthetic design implications.
Rao SS; Boyd LA; Mulroy SJ; Bontrager EL; Gronley JK; Perry J
IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1998 Jun; 6(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 9631330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees.
Fey NP; Klute GK; Neptune RR
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Dec; 26(10):1025-32. PubMed ID: 21777999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of the energy-storing capabilities of SACH and Carbon Copy II prosthetic feet during the stance phase of gait in a person with below-knee amputation.
Barr AE; Siegel KL; Danoff JV; McGarvey CL; Tomasko A; Sable I; Stanhope SJ
Phys Ther; 1992 May; 72(5):344-54. PubMed ID: 1631203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of oxygen consumption for conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in transfemoral amputees.
Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J
Clin Rehabil; 2008; 22(10-11):896-901. PubMed ID: 18955421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transtibial amputee gait efficiency: Energy storage and return versus solid ankle cushioned heel prosthetic feet.
Gardiner J; Bari AZ; Howard D; Kenney L
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2016; 53(6):1133-1138. PubMed ID: 28355033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of prosthetic foot type and visual alteration on postural steadiness in below-knee amputees.
Arifin N; Abu Osman NA; Ali S; Wan Abas WA
Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Mar; 13(1):23. PubMed ID: 24597518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low-cost prosthetic feet for underserved populations: A comparison of gait analysis and mechanical stiffness.
Banks BP; Frei JS; Spencer A; Renninger KD; Grover JK; Abbott K; Carlson BJ; Bruening DA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Aug; 47(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 36701193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees.
Agrawal V; Gailey RS; Gaunaurd IA; O'Toole C; Finnieston A; Tolchin R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Oct; 39(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 24925671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lower limb amputee gait characteristics on a specifically designed test ramp: Preliminary results of a biomechanical comparison of two prosthetic foot concepts.
Schmalz T; Altenburg B; Ernst M; Bellmann M; Rosenbaum D
Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():161-167. PubMed ID: 30497035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
