351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11000155)
1. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.
Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital chest imaging: selenium radiography versus storage phosphor imaging. Comparison of visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
Biemans JM; Van Heesewijk JP; Van Der Graaf Y
Invest Radiol; 2002 Jan; 37(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 11753154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of pulmonary edema in pigs: storage phosphor versus amorphous selenium-based flat-panel-detector radiography.
Kim TS; Im JG; Goo JM; Lee KH; Lee YJ; Kim SH; Kim S
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 12034937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of simulated chest lesions by using soft-copy reading: comparison of an amorphous silicon flat-panel-detector system and a storage-phosphor system.
Goo JM; Im JG; Lee HJ; Chung MJ; Seo JB; Kim HY; Lee YJ; Kang JW; Kim JH
Radiology; 2002 Jul; 224(1):242-6. PubMed ID: 12091690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Digital radiography: from storage phosphor plates to direct detector systems].
Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Stadler A
Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):30-4. PubMed ID: 12621834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector. Clinical experiences].
Schmidt EL; Herbig W
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 12764586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease.
Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; Boot MV; Geleijns J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Aug; 185(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 16037503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital chest radiography with a large-area flat-panel silicon X-ray detector: clinical comparison with conventional radiography.
Hennigs SP; Garmer M; Jaeger HJ; Classen R; Jacobs A; Gissler HM; Christmann A; Mathias K
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1688-96. PubMed ID: 11511890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M; Schmidt A; Neitzel U; Galanski M
Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.
Rapp-Bernhardt U; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Esseling R; Roehl FW; Schiborr M; Theobald-Hormann I; Heindel W
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study.
Balassy C; Prokop M; Weber M; Sailer J; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):752-6. PubMed ID: 15728593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Can digital selenium-based radiography in thoracic diagnosis replace the analog x-ray imaging technic?].
Zähringer M; Krug B; Dölken W; Gossmann A; Lackner K
Rofo; 1997 Jul; 167(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 9289041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
Ludwig K; Ahlers K; Wormanns D; Freund M; Bernhardt TM; Diederich S; Heindel W
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
