230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11000162)
1. Underestimation of breast cancer with II-gauge vacuum suction biopsy.
Philpotts LE; Lee CH; Horvath LJ; Lange RC; Carter D; Tocino I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1047-50. PubMed ID: 11000162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision.
Darling ML; Smith DN; Lester SC; Kaelin C; Selland DL; Denison CM; DiPiro PJ; Rose DI; Rhei E; Meyer JE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1341-6. PubMed ID: 11044038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Liberman L; Smolkin JH; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Rosen PP
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):251-60. PubMed ID: 9646821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: improved accuracy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted versus the 14-gauge core biopsy needle.
Sohn V; Arthurs Z; Herbert G; Keylock J; Perry J; Eckert M; Fellabaum D; Smith D; Brown T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Sep; 14(9):2497-501. PubMed ID: 17564749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Rao A; Parker S; Ratzer E; Stephens J; Fenoglio M
Am J Surg; 2002 Dec; 184(6):534-7; discussion 537. PubMed ID: 12488158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Liberman L; Holland AE; Marjan D; Murray MP; Bartella L; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Wynn RT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):684-90. PubMed ID: 17312054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors that impact the upgrading of atypical ductal hyperplasia.
Gümüş H; Mills P; Gümüş M; Fish D; Jones S; Jones P; Devalia H; Sever A
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 23019055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Breast calcifications with percutaneous vacuum-assisted biopsy diagnosis of malignancy or atypical hyerplasia: correlations with surgical findings].
Piubello Q; Montemezzi S; D'Atri C
Pathologica; 2002 Dec; 94(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 12540993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. To excise or to sample the mammographic target: what is the goal of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy?
Liberman L; Kaplan JB; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Menell JH; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 12185043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Percutaneous removal of malignant mammographic lesions at stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Rosen PP; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Borgen PI
Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):711-5. PubMed ID: 9494489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: can invasion be predicted?
Lee CH; Carter D; Philpotts LE; Couce ME; Horvath LJ; Lange RC; Tocino I
Radiology; 2000 Nov; 217(2):466-70. PubMed ID: 11058647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of histologic underestimation rates with 11- and 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB; Lazarus E; Giri D; Schepps B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):W275-9. PubMed ID: 17954625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of Columnar Cell Lesions and Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia by Ultrasound-Guided Core Biopsy: Findings Associated with Underestimation of Breast Carcinoma.
Ahn HS; Jang M; Kim SM; Yun BL; Kim SW; Kang EY; Park SY
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1457-63. PubMed ID: 27067419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Brem RF; Behrndt VS; Sanow L; Gatewood OM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1405-7. PubMed ID: 10227526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Suh YJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Kwak JY; Koo HR; Yoon JH
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e349-56. PubMed ID: 22422382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of a vacuum-assisted percutaneous intact specimen sampling device to a vacuum-assisted core needle sampling device for breast biopsy: initial experience.
Killebrew LK; Oneson RH
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 16848839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsy of mammographic breast lesions.
Pandelidis S; Heiland D; Jones D; Stough K; Trapeni J; Suliman Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2003; 10(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 12513959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up.
Mahoney MC; Robinson-Smith TM; Shaughnessy EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):949-54. PubMed ID: 16985141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the upgrade rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsy of calcifications different for digital and film-screen mammography?
McLaughlin CT; Neal CH; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 25247961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flat epithelial atypia: comparison between 9-gauge and 11-gauge devices.
Villa A; Chiesa F; Massa T; Friedman D; Canavese G; Baccini P; Calabrese M; Tagliafico A
Clin Breast Cancer; 2013 Dec; 13(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 24094905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
