These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11000322)

  • 1. The subjective image quality of direct digital and conventional panoramic radiography.
    Gijbels F; De Meyer AM; Bou Serhal C; Van den Bossche C; Declerck J; Persoons M; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Sep; 4(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 11000322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of anatomical structures in digitally filtered and conventional panoramic radiographs: a clinical evaluation.
    Baksi BG; Alpöz E; Sogur E; Mert A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):424-30. PubMed ID: 20841460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The subjective image quality of conventional and digital panoramic radiography among 6 to 10 year old children.
    Makris N; Tsiklakis K; Alexiou KE; Vierrou AM; Stefaniotis T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 17315805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
    Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of perceived diagnostic image quality in direct digital panoramic images between standard and advanced external GOP image processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R; Persson B
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Nov; 77(8):560-565. PubMed ID: 31146623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective image quality of digital panoramic radiographs displayed on monitor and printed on various hardcopy media.
    Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Pauwels H; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2004 Mar; 8(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 14652733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system.
    Parissis N; Angelopoulos C; Mantegari S; Karamanis S; Masood F; Tsirlis A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jan; 11(1):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20098961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging.
    Pittayapat P; Galiti D; Huang Y; Dreesen K; Schreurs M; Souza PC; Rubira-Bullen IR; Westphalen FH; Pauwels R; Kalema G; Willems G; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):293-300. PubMed ID: 22382448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of image quality for the assessment of the marginal bone level in panoramic radiography. A comparison of radiographs from different dental clinics.
    Akesson L; Håkansson J; Rohlin M; Zöger B
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(1-2):9-21. PubMed ID: 8362363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of dose reduction in digital dental panoramic radiography on image quality.
    Dannewitz B; Hassfeld S; Eickholz P; Mühling J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 11803389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The comparison of subjective image quality in conventional and digital panoramic radiography.
    Peker I; Toraman AM; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19336855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):328-333. PubMed ID: 30623704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a new digital panoramic system: a comparison with film.
    Ramesh A; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11313729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detectability of normal anatomy in digital panoramic radiographs.
    Gross H; Nilsson M; Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J; 2014; 38(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 25771652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of exposure in panoramic radiography while maintaining image quality using adaptive filtering.
    Svenson B; Larsson L; Båth M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 26478956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Localization of mental and mandibular foramens on the conventional and digital panoramic images.
    Peker I; Gungor K; Semiz M; Tekdemir I
    Coll Antropol; 2009 Sep; 33(3):857-62. PubMed ID: 19860115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.