These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11000342)

  • 1. Evaluation of differences between fan-beam and pencil-beam densitometers.
    Mazess RB; Barden HS
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2000 Oct; 67(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 11000342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Axial and total-body bone densitometry using a narrow-angle fan-beam.
    Mazess RB; Hanson JA; Payne R; Nord R; Wilson M
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 10793875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evaluation of consistency between body composition assessments in pediatric population using pencil beam and fan beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometers.
    Pludowski P; Jaworski M; Matusik H; Kobylinska M; Klimek P; Lorenc RS
    J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 20171570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-calibration of GE/Lunar pencil and fan-beam dual energy densitometers--bone mineral density and body composition studies.
    Oldroyd B; Smith AH; Truscott JG
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 57(8):977-87. PubMed ID: 12879093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pediatric in vivo cross-calibration between the GE Lunar Prodigy and DPX-L bone densitometers.
    Crabtree NJ; Shaw NJ; Boivin CM; Oldroyd B; Truscott JG
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):2157-67. PubMed ID: 16234997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.
    Blake GM; Harrison EJ; Adams JE
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Jul; 75(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15037973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inclusion of Regional Body Composition Parameters Improves Bone Mineral Density Cross-Calibration Between GE Lunar Prodigy and iDXA Densitometers.
    Saarelainen J; Hakulinen M; Rikkonen T; Kröger H; Koivumaa-Honkanen H; Honkanen R; Jurvelin JS
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 27546558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pencil-beam vs fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: body composition and bone mineral.
    Soriano JM; Ioannidou E; Wang J; Thornton JC; Horlick MN; Gallagher D; Heymsfield SB; Pierson RN
    J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 15319498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of narrow-angle fan-beam and pencil-beam densitometers: in vivo and phantom study of the effect of bone density, scan mode, and tissue depth on spine measurements.
    Laskey MA; Murgatroyd PR; Prentice A
    J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 15319507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Agreement between dual x-ray absorptiometers using pencil beam and fan beam: indicators of bone health and whole-body plus appendicular tissue composition in adult athletes.
    Tavares Ó; Duarte JP; Costa DC; Sousa-E-Silva P; Martinho D; Lus LGO; Duarte-Mendes P; Valente-Dos-Santos J; Conde J; Casanova JM; Cyrino ES; Coelho-E-Silva MJ
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2018 Apr; 64(4):330-338. PubMed ID: 30133612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
    Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of pencil-, fan-, and cone-beam dual X-ray absorptiometers for evaluation of bone mineral content in excised rat bone.
    Libouban H; Simon Y; Silve C; Legrand E; Baslé MF; Audran M; Chappard D
    J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 12665635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discordance of longitudinal changes in bone density between densitometers.
    Frost SA; Nguyen ND; Center JR; Eisman JA; Nguyen TV
    Bone; 2007 Oct; 41(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 17870039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-calibration and comparison of variability in 2 bone densitometers in a research setting: the framingham experience.
    Gagnon DR; McLean RR; Hannan MT; Cupples LA; Hogan M; Kiel DP
    J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 20347371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo and in vitro comparison of densitometers in the NOREPOS study.
    Omsland TK; Emaus N; Gjesdal CG; Falch JA; Tell GS; Forsen L; Berntsen GK; Meyer HE
    J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 18158262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurements of bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and proximal femur using lunar prodigy and the new pencil-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Choi D; Kim DY; Han CS; Kim S; Bok HS; Huh W; Ko JW; Hong SH
    Skeletal Radiol; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19924413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-calibration of a fan-beam X-ray densitometer with a pencil-beam system.
    Bouyoucef SE; Cullum ID; Ell PJ
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jun; 69(822):522-31. PubMed ID: 8757654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men.
    Modlesky CM; Lewis RD; Yetman KA; Rose B; Rosskopf LB; Snow TK; Sparling PB
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1996 Nov; 64(5):669-76. PubMed ID: 8901784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Wilkinson S
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):166-76. PubMed ID: 11718390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnification error of femoral geometry using fan beam densitometers.
    Pocock NA; Noakes KA; Majerovic Y; Griffiths MR
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1997 Jan; 60(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 9030472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.