270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11002948)
1. How can the incidence of negative specimens resulting from large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone (LLETZ) be reduced? An analysis of negative LLETZ specimens and development of a predictive model.
Howells RE; O'Mahony F; Tucker H; Millinship J; Jones PW; Redman CW
BJOG; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1075-82. PubMed ID: 11002948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does colposcopically directed punch biopsy reduce the incidence of negative LLETZ?
Denny LA; Soeters R; Dehaeck K; Bloch B
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Jul; 102(7):545-8. PubMed ID: 7647056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive factors for residual disease in the uterine cervix after large loop excision of the transformation zone in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Hamontri S; Israngura N; Rochanawutanon M; Bullangpoti S; Tangtrakul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Feb; 93 Suppl 2():S74-80. PubMed ID: 21299083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Indication and outcome of repeat large loop excision biopsies of the cervix.
Moss EL; Appleyard TL; Winning JM; Jones PW; Luesley DM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Apr; 15(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 21169867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biopsy and selective recall compared with immediate large loop excision in management of women with low grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: multicentre randomised controlled trial.
TOMBOLA Group
BMJ; 2009 Jul; 339():b2548. PubMed ID: 19638647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with transformation zone type 3: cervical biopsy versus large loop excision.
Gustafson LW; Hammer A; Bennetsen MH; Kristensen CB; Majeed H; Petersen LK; Andersen B; Bor P
BJOG; 2022 Dec; 129(13):2132-2140. PubMed ID: 35488417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is direct large loop electric excision for the transformation zone reasonable in the investigation of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in cervical smears?
Ng KY; Chang CK; Chen J; Wang PH; Teng SW
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 15053064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screen-and-treat approach in managing cervical cancer precursor lesions: An observational study with 524 women.
Yoneda JY; Teixeira JC; Derchain S; Bragança JF; Zeferino LC; Vale DB
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jan; 280():78-82. PubMed ID: 36434824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) without histological proof of high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion: Results of a two-year continuous retrospective study.
Pecourt M; Gondry J; Foulon A; Lanta-Delmas S; Sergent F; Chevreau J
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 49(6):101621. PubMed ID: 31430562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The volume perspective: a comparison of two excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (laser versus LLETZ).
Phadnis SV; Atilade A; Young MP; Evans H; Walker PG
BJOG; 2010 Apr; 117(5):615-9. PubMed ID: 20156211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overtreatment rate after immediate local excision of suspected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A prospective cohort study.
Kiviharju M; Heinonen A; Jakobsson M; Virtanen S; Auvinen E; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Dillner J; Kyrgiou M; Nieminen P; Aro K; Kalliala I
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Nov; 167(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 36153296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 'See and treat' electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ
J Fam Pract; 1996 Mar; 42(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 8636676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 23296191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk factors for unsatisfactory colposcopy after large loop excision of the transformation zone: The results of a four-year multicenter prospective study.
Chevreau J; Carcopino X; Foulon A; Preaubert L; Lanta-Delmas S; Sergent F; Gondry J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():156-160. PubMed ID: 31288186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with unsatisfactory colposcopy results.
Massad LS; Tate N; Cejtin E; Collins YC
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15870518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colposcopy and microcolpohysteroscopy qualification for large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Pityński K; Basta A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1999; 20(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 10410888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low recurrence rate of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful excision and routine colposcopy during follow-up.
Lili E; Chatzistamatiou K; Kalpaktsidou-Vakiani A; Moysiadis T; Agorastos T
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jan; 97(4):e9719. PubMed ID: 29369205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endocervicoscopy and Biopsy to Detect Cervical Intraepithelial Squamous Neoplasia in Nonvisible Squamocolumnar Junction With Unsatisfactory Colposcopy: A Pilot Study.
Rahimi S; Marani C; Gardner F; Yeoh CC; Akaev I; Votano S
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533034617753811. PubMed ID: 29375019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Should punch biopsies be used when high-grade disease is suspected at initial colposcopic assessment? A prospective study.
Byrom J; Douce G; Jones PW; Tucker H; Millinship J; Dhar K; Redman CW
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(1):253-6. PubMed ID: 16445640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
