132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11002962)
1. A comparative analysis of cross sectional imaging techniques in minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Itoh K; Toki T; Shiohara S; Oguchi O; Konishi I; Fujii S
BJOG; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1158-63. PubMed ID: 11002962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Misdiagnosis Analysis of Cervical Minimal Deviation Adenocarcinoma: a Report of Three Rare Cases and Literature Review.
Sui M; Pei Y; Li D; Li Q; Zhu P; Xu T; Cui M
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2016 Dec; 46(6):680-690. PubMed ID: 27993884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of diagnostic fluid hysteroscopy in the assessment of cervical invasion by endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with transvaginal sonography and MRI.
Cicinelli E; Marinaccio M; Barba B; Tinelli R; Colafiglio G; Pedote P; Rossi C; Pinto V
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 18701154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adenoma malignum of the uterine cervix: imaging features with clinicopathologic correlation.
Park SB; Lee JH; Lee YH; Song MJ; Lim KT; Hong SR; Kim JK
Acta Radiol; 2013 Feb; 54(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 23081960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of the accuracy of ultrasound, X-ray CT and low field MRI in the demonstration of cervical and uterine malignancy.
Smith FW; Cherryman GR; Bayliss AP; Fullerton WT; Law AN; Robertson EM; Weir J; Donald RT; Mallard JR
Magn Reson Imaging; 1989; 7(6):677-9. PubMed ID: 2698431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI of cervical adenocarcinoma with cystic components.
Takamura M; Murakami T; Kurachi H; Narumi Y; Tsuda K; Enomoto T; Murata Y; Nakamura H
Clin Imaging; 1999; 23(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 10332598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Power Doppler findings of adenoma malignum of uterine cervix.
Umesaki N; Nakai Y; Honda K; Kawamura N; Kanaoka Y; Nishimura S; Ishiko O; Ogita S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1998; 45(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 9565150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adenocarcinoma involving the uterine cervix: magnetic resonance imaging findings in tumours of endometrial, compared with cervical, origin.
Haider MA; Patlas M; Jhaveri K; Chapman W; Fyles A; Rosen B
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2006 Feb; 57(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 16719212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient at 3T in distinguishing between adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix and endometrium.
Lin YC; Lin G; Chen YR; Yen TC; Wang CC; Ng KK
Chang Gung Med J; 2011; 34(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 21392479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fractional curettage, hysteroscopy and imaging techniques: transvaginal sonography (TVS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of cervical canal involvement in cases of endometrial carcinoma.
Kietlińska Z; Stelmachów J; Antczak-Judycka A; Timorek A; Sawicki W; Tymińska B
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1998; 19(6):561-4. PubMed ID: 10215441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uterine cervical adenocarcinoma associated with lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia: Radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Ohya A; Asaka S; Fujinaga Y; Kadoya M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Feb; 44(2):312-322. PubMed ID: 29144012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imaging of cervical pathology.
Rezvani M; Shaaban A
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 52(1):94-111. PubMed ID: 19179863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adenoma malignum of uterine cervix in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: CT and US features.
Choi CG; Kim SH; Kim JS; Chi JG; Song ES; Han MC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(5):819-21. PubMed ID: 8370843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional power Doppler color ultrasonographic features of a minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Hereter L; Tresserra F; Graupera B; Pascual MA; Martinez MA; Ubeda A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2010; 31(3):336-8. PubMed ID: 21077483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI of endocervical glandular disorders: three cases of a deep nabothian cyst and three cases of a minimal-deviation adenocarcinoma.
Oguri H; Maeda N; Izumiya C; Kusume T; Yamamoto Y; Fukaya T
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 22(9):1333-7. PubMed ID: 15607108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preoperative differential diagnosis of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma and lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia of the uterine cervix: a multicenter study of clinicopathology and magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Takatsu A; Shiozawa T; Miyamoto T; Kurosawa K; Kashima H; Yamada T; Kaku T; Mikami Y; Kiyokawa T; Tsuda H; Ishii K; Togashi K; Koyama T; Fujinaga Y; Kadoya M; Hashi A; Susumu N; Konishi I
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Oct; 21(7):1287-96. PubMed ID: 21685796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical carcinoma: efficacy of thin-section oblique axial T2-weighted images for evaluating parametrial invasion.
Shiraiwa M; Joja I; Asakawa T; Okuno K; Shibutani O; Akamatsu N; Kudo T; Hiraki Y
Abdom Imaging; 1999; 24(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 10475940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: MR imaging.
Torashima M; Yamashita Y; Hatanaka Y; Takahashi M; Miyazaki K; Okamura H
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1997; 21(4):253-60. PubMed ID: 9402238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: A retrospective study of 21 cases.
Bonin L; Devouassoux-Shisheboran M; Golfier F
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 May; 48(5):319-327. PubMed ID: 30807852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
