BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11003070)

  • 1. Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: which test is best?
    Dort JC; Tobolski C; Brown D
    J Otolaryngol; 2000 Aug; 29(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 11003070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Meier S; Narabayashi O; Probst R; Schmuziger N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 15183584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost and cost-effectiveness of universal screening for hearing loss in newborns.
    Kezirian EJ; White KR; Yueh B; Sullivan SD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Apr; 124(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 11283492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
    Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Infant hearing screening: effects of timeline.
    Tsui PW; McPherson B; Wong EC; Ng IH
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 33(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 18429859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.
    Benito-Orejas JI; Ramírez B; Morais D; Almaraz A; Fernández-Calvo JL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.
    De Capua B; De Felice C; Costantini D; Bagnoli F; Passali D
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of two hearing screening protocols in NICU in Shanghai.
    Xu ZM; Cheng WX; Yang XL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Oct; 75(10):1225-9. PubMed ID: 21802153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of a nation-wide automated auditory brainstem response hearing screening programme in neonatal intensive care units.
    van Straaten HL; Hille ET; Kok JH; Verkerk PH;
    Acta Paediatr; 2003; 92(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 12725549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A preliminary study of a hearing screening model for newborn].
    Liu Z; Bu X; Xing G; Lu L
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):292-4. PubMed ID: 12762000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neonatal hearing screening: a combined click evoked and tone burst otoacoustic emission approach.
    Zhang VW; McPherson B; Shi BX; Tang JL; Wong BY
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Mar; 72(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 18178260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Sensitivity of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory brain-stem response in neonatal hearing screening, a comparative study].
    Xu ZM; Li J; Hu TZ; Sun JH; Shen XM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 83(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 12812641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.
    Suppiej A; Rizzardi E; Zanardo V; Franzoi M; Ermani M; Orzan E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The performance of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response in the same ear of the babies in neonatal unit.
    Abdul Wahid SN; Md Daud MK; Sidek D; Abd Rahman N; Mansor S; Zakaria MN
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1366-9. PubMed ID: 22770594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening of high-risk infants using distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Bowes M; Smith C; Tan AK; Varette-Cerre P
    J Otolaryngol; 1999 Aug; 28(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 10461253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Telemedicine for audiology screening of infants.
    Krumm M; Huffman T; Dick K; Klich R
    J Telemed Telecare; 2008; 14(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 18348758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial audiologic assessment of infants referred from well baby, special care, and neonatal intensive care unit nurseries.
    Karzon RK; Lieu JE
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16803788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A combined neonatal hearing screening protocol].
    Almenar Latorre A; Tapia Toca MC; Fernández Pérez C; Moro Serrano M
    An Esp Pediatr; 2002 Jul; 57(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 12139894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Neonatal hearing screening. A comparison of automatic auditory brainstem audiometry and otoacoustic emissions].
    Pedersen L; Møller TR; Wetke R; Ovesen T
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Feb; 170(8):642-6. PubMed ID: 18364157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Newborn hearing screening: costs of establishing a program.
    Lemons J; Fanaroff A; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Murray G; Diefendorf A
    J Perinatol; 2002 Mar; 22(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 11896516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.