These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11003435)

  • 41. [The single-strand suture in the closure of laparotomy incisions].
    Melotto A; Villani RD; Corsi C
    Minerva Med; 1984 Sep; 75(36):2097-8. PubMed ID: 6384829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery.
    Ramsey PS; White AM; Guinn DA; Lu GC; Ramin SM; Davies JK; Neely CL; Newby C; Fonseca L; Case AS; Kaslow RA; Kirby RS; Rouse DJ; Hauth JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):967-73. PubMed ID: 15863532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Results of the Smead-Jones technique of closure of vertical midline incisions for emergency laparotomies--a prospective study of 403 patients.
    Sivam NS; Suresh S; Hadke MS; Kate V; Ananthakrishnan N
    Trop Gastroenterol; 1995; 16(4):62-7. PubMed ID: 8854960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of bursting pressure of abdominal wall defects repaired by three conventional techniques.
    Seror D; Nissan A; Spira RM; Feigin E; Udassin R; Freund HR
    Am Surg; 2003 Nov; 69(11):978-80. PubMed ID: 14627260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Surgical wound dehiscence and a technique for laparotomy closure with continuous loop sutures].
    Engelová D; Antos F
    Rozhl Chir; 1995 May; 74(4):172-5. PubMed ID: 7570195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Invagination versus simple ligation of the caecal tip with reference to the strength of the caecal closure. An experimental study in the rat.
    Arnbjörnsson E
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1986; 75(3):180-2. PubMed ID: 3527028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of stitch length on wound complications.
    Harlaar JJ; van Ramshorst GH; Jeekel H; Lange JF
    Arch Surg; 2010 Jun; 145(6):599; author reply 599-600. PubMed ID: 20566985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The subcutaneous loop: a single suture technique for skin closure after superficial and subcutaneous surgery.
    Naimer SA; Biton A; Topaz M
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2006; 5(10):966-8. PubMed ID: 17373145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Prospective, randomized, blinded study of a new wound closure film versus cutaneous suture for surgical wound closure.
    Kuo F; Lee D; Rogers GS
    Dermatol Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 16706763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Laparotomy closure.
    Leaper DJ
    Br J Hosp Med; 1985 Jun; 33(6):317-22. PubMed ID: 3160421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Closure of the abdominal wound with single-layer and double-layer technique. Animal studies.
    Nilsson T
    Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(6):399-403. PubMed ID: 6459705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effect of suture technique on early healing of intestinal anastomoses in rats.
    Jonsson T; Högström H
    Eur J Surg; 1992 May; 158(5):267-70. PubMed ID: 1354490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Negative side-effects of retention sutures for abdominal wound closure. A prospective randomised study.
    Rink AD; Goldschmidt D; Dietrich J; Nagelschmidt M; Vestweber KH
    Eur J Surg; 2000 Dec; 166(12):932-7. PubMed ID: 11152253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of stitch length on complications.
    Hardin M; Oh JS; White CE; Cohn SM
    Arch Surg; 2010 Jun; 145(6):600; author reply 600-1. PubMed ID: 20566986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Influence of abdominal-wound closure technique on complications after surgery: a randomised study.
    Niggebrugge AH; Trimbos JB; Hermans J; Steup WH; Van De Velde CJ
    Lancet; 1999 May; 353(9164):1563-7. PubMed ID: 10334254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Closing midline abdominal incisions.
    Israelsson LA; Millbourn D
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2012 Dec; 397(8):1201-7. PubMed ID: 23143146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Closure of midline laparotomy incisions with polydioxanone and nylon: the importance of suture technique.
    Israelsson LA; Jonsson T
    Br J Surg; 1994 Nov; 81(11):1606-8. PubMed ID: 7827883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A double-stranded absorbable suture for fascial closure in laparotomy incisions.
    Waters DJ; Rose N; Zagoren A
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1985 Oct; 85(10):642-5. PubMed ID: 3905727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [New developments in abdominal wall closure].
    Carlson MA
    Chirurg; 2000 Jul; 71(7):743-53. PubMed ID: 10986596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Aesthetic comparison of wound closure techniques in a porcine model.
    Tritle NM; Haller JR; Gray SD
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Nov; 111(11 Pt 1):1949-51. PubMed ID: 11801975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.