These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11003435)
41. [The single-strand suture in the closure of laparotomy incisions]. Melotto A; Villani RD; Corsi C Minerva Med; 1984 Sep; 75(36):2097-8. PubMed ID: 6384829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. Ramsey PS; White AM; Guinn DA; Lu GC; Ramin SM; Davies JK; Neely CL; Newby C; Fonseca L; Case AS; Kaslow RA; Kirby RS; Rouse DJ; Hauth JC Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):967-73. PubMed ID: 15863532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Results of the Smead-Jones technique of closure of vertical midline incisions for emergency laparotomies--a prospective study of 403 patients. Sivam NS; Suresh S; Hadke MS; Kate V; Ananthakrishnan N Trop Gastroenterol; 1995; 16(4):62-7. PubMed ID: 8854960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of bursting pressure of abdominal wall defects repaired by three conventional techniques. Seror D; Nissan A; Spira RM; Feigin E; Udassin R; Freund HR Am Surg; 2003 Nov; 69(11):978-80. PubMed ID: 14627260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Surgical wound dehiscence and a technique for laparotomy closure with continuous loop sutures]. Engelová D; Antos F Rozhl Chir; 1995 May; 74(4):172-5. PubMed ID: 7570195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Invagination versus simple ligation of the caecal tip with reference to the strength of the caecal closure. An experimental study in the rat. Arnbjörnsson E Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1986; 75(3):180-2. PubMed ID: 3527028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effect of stitch length on wound complications. Harlaar JJ; van Ramshorst GH; Jeekel H; Lange JF Arch Surg; 2010 Jun; 145(6):599; author reply 599-600. PubMed ID: 20566985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The subcutaneous loop: a single suture technique for skin closure after superficial and subcutaneous surgery. Naimer SA; Biton A; Topaz M J Drugs Dermatol; 2006; 5(10):966-8. PubMed ID: 17373145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prospective, randomized, blinded study of a new wound closure film versus cutaneous suture for surgical wound closure. Kuo F; Lee D; Rogers GS Dermatol Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 16706763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Closure of the abdominal wound with single-layer and double-layer technique. Animal studies. Nilsson T Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(6):399-403. PubMed ID: 6459705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effect of suture technique on early healing of intestinal anastomoses in rats. Jonsson T; Högström H Eur J Surg; 1992 May; 158(5):267-70. PubMed ID: 1354490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Negative side-effects of retention sutures for abdominal wound closure. A prospective randomised study. Rink AD; Goldschmidt D; Dietrich J; Nagelschmidt M; Vestweber KH Eur J Surg; 2000 Dec; 166(12):932-7. PubMed ID: 11152253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effect of stitch length on complications. Hardin M; Oh JS; White CE; Cohn SM Arch Surg; 2010 Jun; 145(6):600; author reply 600-1. PubMed ID: 20566986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Influence of abdominal-wound closure technique on complications after surgery: a randomised study. Niggebrugge AH; Trimbos JB; Hermans J; Steup WH; Van De Velde CJ Lancet; 1999 May; 353(9164):1563-7. PubMed ID: 10334254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]