247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11004067)
1. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid?
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A
Anesth Analg; 2000 Oct; 91(4):1017-20. PubMed ID: 11004067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do laryngeal mask airway devices attenuate liquid flow between the esophagus and pharynx? A randomized, controlled cadaver study.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Rädler C; Pühringer F
Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):904-7. PubMed ID: 10195545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Water flow between the upper esophagus and pharynx for the LMA and COPA in fresh cadavers. Laryngeal mask airway, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Can J Anaesth; 1999 Nov; 46(11):1064-6. PubMed ID: 10566928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the standard laryngeal mask airway and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in obese patients.
Natalini G; Franceschetti ME; Pantelidi MT; Rosano A; Lanza G; Bernardini A
Br J Anaesth; 2003 Mar; 90(3):323-6. PubMed ID: 12594145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal tube airway versus ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Jun; 38(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 12759874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Br J Anaesth; 2000 Aug; 85(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 10992836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protection against large-volume regurgitated fluid aspiration by the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
Su BC; Yang MW; Lee HC; Chang CH; Lin CC
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2008 Mar; 46(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 18390399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A comparison of the Proseal laryngeal mask to the standard laryngeal mask on anesthesized, non-relaxed patients].
Braun U; Zerbst M; Füllekrug B; Gentzel I; Hempel V; Leier M; Peters T; Hobbensiefken G; Klein U; Heuser D; Weyland A; Rey D; Weirich C; Krier C
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2002 Dec; 37(12):727-33. PubMed ID: 12469285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [An auto control comparison of the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and standard laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation].
Li CW; Xue FS; Mao P; Xu YC; Liu Y; Zhang GH; Liu KP; Sun HT
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2007 Feb; 19(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 17326908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway.
Goldmann K; Roettger C; Wulf H
Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 16428533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12553391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resting esophageal sphincter pressures and deglutition frequency in awake subjects after oropharyngeal topical anesthesia and laryngeal mask device insertion.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Anesth Analg; 2001 Jul; 93(1):226-9. PubMed ID: 11429371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic and ProSeal using a cadaver model.
Schmidbauer W; Bercker S; Volk T; Bogusch G; Mager G; Kerner T
Br J Anaesth; 2009 Jan; 102(1):135-9. PubMed ID: 19011262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of the tonsillar gag on efficacy of seal, anatomic position, airway patency, and airway protection with the flexible laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, cross-over study of fresh adult cadavers.
Brimacombe JR; Keller C; Gunkel AR; Pühringer F
Anesth Analg; 1999 Jul; 89(1):181-6. PubMed ID: 10389800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)- Proseal and the LMA-Classic in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade.
Lardner DR; Cox RG; Ewen A; Dickinson D
Can J Anaesth; 2008 Jan; 55(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 18166745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Brimacombe L
Anesth Analg; 2002 Sep; 95(3):770-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12198070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature.
Cook TM; Lee G; Nolan JP
Can J Anaesth; 2005; 52(7):739-60. PubMed ID: 16103390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protection from aspiration with the LMA-ProSeal after vomiting: a case report.
Mark DA
Can J Anaesth; 2003 Jan; 50(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 12514156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
