These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11004358)
1. Ultrasonography for cervical length measurement: agreement between transvaginal and translabial techniques. Carr DB; Smith K; Parsons L; Chansky K; Shields LE Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 96(4):554-8. PubMed ID: 11004358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography. Cicero S; Skentou C; Souka A; To MS; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 17(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 11339192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of transvaginal cervical length measurements and quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization of the cervix in the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Stein W; Hellmeyer L; Schmidt S; Tekesin I Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E169-74. PubMed ID: 21630183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation of uterine cervical length measurement from transabdominal, transperineal and transvaginal ultrasonography. Raungrongmorakot K; Tanmoun N; Ruangvutilert P; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Tontisirin P; Butsansee W J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Mar; 87(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15117051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women. Ozdemir I; Demirci F; Yucel O Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 15904442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: a blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation. Kurtzman JT; Goldsmith LJ; Gall SA; Spinnato JA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 179(4):852-7. PubMed ID: 9790358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Predictive value of cervical length by transvaginal sonography for preterm pregnancy during mid- and late-trimester of pregnancy]. Qu SH; Shi CY; Chen Q; Chen JY; Sun WJ; Sun Y; Zhang XX; Fan LX; Yang HX Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):748-52. PubMed ID: 22321348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical length in late second and third trimesters: a mixture model for predicting delivery. Souka AP; Papastefanou I; Papadopoulos G; Chrelias C; Kassanos D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 24817155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnant women with a cervical pessary. Goya M; Pratcorona L; Higueras T; Perez-Hoyos S; Carreras E; Cabero L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 21305638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does cervical length at 13-15 weeks' gestation predict preterm delivery in an unselected population? Conoscenti G; Meir YJ; D'Ottavio G; Rustico MA; Pinzano R; Fischer-Tamaro L; Stampalija T; Natale R; Maso G; Mandruzzato G Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 21(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12601832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reference data representative of normal findings at two-dimensional and three-dimensional gray-scale ultrasound examination of the cervix from 17 to 41 weeks' gestation. Rovas L; Sladkevicius P; Strobel E; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 16388513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Serial translabial sonographic measurement of cervical dimensions between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation in pregnant Thai women. Liabsuetrakul T; Suntharasaj T; Suwanrath C; Leetanaporn R; Rattanaprueksachart R; Tuntiseranee P Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Aug; 20(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 12153668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical length at 11-14 weeks' and 22-24 weeks' gestation evaluated by transvaginal sonography, and gestational age at delivery. Carvalho MH; Bittar RE; Brizot ML; Maganha PP; Borges da Fonseca ES; Zugaib M Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 21(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 12601833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Valentin L; Bergelin I Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 12230448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment? Saul LL; Kurtzman JT; Hagemann C; Ghamsary M; Wing DA J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Sep; 27(9):1305-11. PubMed ID: 18716140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Predictive value of cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound during the second and the third trimester of pregnancy for preterm birth in twin pregnancies]. Zuo XF; Du YF; Yang J; Cheng ZY; Gong LJ; Zhang AQ; Han N; Wei Y; Zhao YY Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 May; 54(5):318-323. PubMed ID: 31154713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix length and the prediction of preterm delivery]. Urbaniak T; Tomaszewska K; Klejewski A Ginekol Pol; 2005 Jul; 76(7):543-7. PubMed ID: 16363380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review. Crane JM; Hutchens D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 May; 31(5):579-87. PubMed ID: 18412093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The cervix as a predictor of preterm delivery in 'at-risk' women. Cook CM; Ellwood DA Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 10775991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]