These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11004358)

  • 21. Translabial ultrasound of the third-trimester uterine cervix. Correlation with digital examination.
    Mahony BS; Nyberg DA; Luthy DA; Hirsch JH; Hickok DE; Petty CN
    J Ultrasound Med; 1990 Dec; 9(12):717-23. PubMed ID: 2277401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Progressive cervical length changes versus single cervical length measurement by transvaginal ultrasound for prediction of preterm delivery.
    Dilek TU; Yazici G; Gurbuz A; Tasdelen B; Gulhan S; Dilek B; Dilek S
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2007; 64(4):175-9. PubMed ID: 17664877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intrapartum measurement of cervical dilatation using translabial 3-dimensional ultrasonography: correlation with digital examination and interobserver and intraobserver agreement assessment.
    Zimerman AL; Smolin A; Maymon R; Weinraub Z; Herman A; Tobvin Y
    J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Oct; 28(10):1289-96. PubMed ID: 19778874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Change in cervical length after cerclage as a predictor of preterm delivery.
    Dijkstra K; Funai EF; O'Neill L; Rebarber A; Paidas MJ; Young BK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 10960624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Longitudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24 weeks' gestation in women at risk for pregnancy loss or preterm birth.
    Guzman ER; Mellon C; Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Walters C; Gipson K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 92(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 9649088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before 14 weeks predict preterm delivery in high-risk pregnancies?
    Berghella V; Talucci M; Desai A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 21(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 12601834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ultrasound of the cervix during pregnancy.
    Mahony BS
    Abdom Imaging; 1997; 22(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 9321441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Cervical ultrasound assessment for predicting the risk of premature delivery].
    Pietryga M; Brazert J; Wender-Ozegowska E; Mitkowska H; Persona-Sliwińska A; Biczysko R
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2003; 7(3 Suppl 1):157-65. PubMed ID: 15537257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Identifying twin gestations at low risk for preterm birth with a transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement at 24 to 26 weeks' gestation.
    Imseis HM; Albert TA; Iams JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 177(5):1149-55. PubMed ID: 9396911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction of preterm birth by second trimester cervical sonography in twin pregnancies.
    Yang JH; Kuhlman K; Daly S; Berghella V
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Apr; 15(4):288-91. PubMed ID: 10895446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Transvaginal ultrasound in evaluation of the uterine cervix during pregnancy].
    Klejewski A; Urbaniak T; Brazert J; Drews K
    Ginekol Pol; 1994 Aug; 65(8):430-4. PubMed ID: 7721150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Magnetic resonance imaging vs. transvaginal ultrasound for cervical length assessment in the second half of pregnancy.
    Brandão RS; Pires CR; de Souza E; Avanza LL; Mattar R; Araujo Júnior E; Nardozza LM; Moron AF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):571-5. PubMed ID: 20350684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dynamic cervical change during real-time ultrasound: prospective characterization and comparison in patients with and without symptoms of preterm labor.
    Kurtzman JT; Jenkins SM; Brewster WR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 23(6):574-8. PubMed ID: 15170798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population.
    Stone PR; Chan EH; McCowan LM; Taylor RS; Mitchell JM;
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Dec; 50(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 21133862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Study of the cervix of normal pregnancy and threatened preterm delivery using transvaginal sonography].
    Shi CY; Zhang YY; Jin YZ; Dong Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2003 May; 38(5):264-6. PubMed ID: 12895306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of threatened preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length.
    Murakawa H; Utumi T; Hasegawa I; Tanaka K; Fuzimori R
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Nov; 82(5):829-32. PubMed ID: 8414332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Association between change in cervical length and spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies.
    Moroz LA; Brock CO; Govindappagari S; Johnson DL; Leopold BH; Gyamfi-Bannerman C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 216(2):159.e1-159.e7. PubMed ID: 27729253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of cervical volume and cervical length to predict preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasound.
    Dilek TU; Gurbuz A; Yazici G; Arslan M; Gulhan S; Pata O; Dilek S
    Am J Perinatol; 2006 Apr; 23(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 16586237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dynamic cervical change: is real-time sonographic cervical shortening predictive of preterm delivery in patients with symptoms of preterm labor?
    Jenkins SM; Kurtzman JT; Osann K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):373-6. PubMed ID: 16565995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations.
    Guzman ER; Walters C; Ananth CV; O'Reilly-Green C; Benito CW; Palermo A; Vintzileos AM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Sep; 18(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 11555447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.