141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11004873)
1. Large-sample confidence intervals for validity and reliability coefficients.
Mendoza JL; Stafford KL; Stauffer JM
Psychol Methods; 2000 Sep; 5(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 11004873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sample size requirements for precise estimates of reliability, generalizability, and validity coefficients.
Charter RA
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1999 Aug; 21(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 10550813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standard errors and confidence intervals for correlations corrected for indirect range restriction: A simulation study comparing analytic and bootstrap methods.
Kennet-Cohen T; Kleper D; Turvall E
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 28631350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sample size planning for composite reliability coefficients: accuracy in parameter estimation via narrow confidence intervals.
Terry L; Kelley K
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):371-401. PubMed ID: 22010985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Varying coefficient meta-analytic methods for alpha reliability.
Bonett DG
Psychol Methods; 2010 Dec; 15(4):368-85. PubMed ID: 20853952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Confidence intervals for population reliability coefficients: Evaluation of methods, recommendations, and software for composite measures.
Kelley K; Pornprasertmanit S
Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):69-92. PubMed ID: 26962759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Reliability and validity of Comprehensive Work Ability Index scales].
Zhang L; Wang ZM; Wang MZ
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 26(6):355-9. PubMed ID: 18771622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling.
Wichmann FA; Hill NJ
Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1314-29. PubMed ID: 11800459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Studies of the norm and psychometrical properties of the ages and stages questionnaires, third edition, with a Chinese national sample].
Wei M; Bian X; Squires J; Yao G; Wang X; Xie H; Song W; Lu J; Zhu C; Yue H; Zhu G; Wang Q; Xu R; Wan C; Sun S; Chen J
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 53(12):913-8. PubMed ID: 26887546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Shedler-Westen assessment procedure (SWAP): evaluating psychometric questions about its reliability, validity, and impact of its fixed score distribution.
Blagov PS; Bi W; Shedler J; Westen D
Assessment; 2012 Sep; 19(3):370-82. PubMed ID: 22327208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement.
Gwet KL
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):29-48. PubMed ID: 18482474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Profile-likelihood Confidence Intervals in Item Response Theory Models.
Chalmers RP; Pek J; Liu Y
Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(5):533-550. PubMed ID: 28594582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric characteristics of the "General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) » in a French representative sample of patients with schizophrenia.
Denis F; Hamad M; Trojak B; Tubert-Jeannin S; Rat C; Pelletier JF; Rude N
BMC Oral Health; 2017 Apr; 17(1):75. PubMed ID: 28399850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Constructing Confidence Intervals for Effect Size Measures of an Indirect Effect.
Lee S; Lei MK; Brody GH
Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):600-13. PubMed ID: 26717121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysing multisource feedback with multilevel structural equation models: Pitfalls and recommendations from a simulation study.
Mahlke J; Schultze M; Eid M
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 May; 72(2):294-315. PubMed ID: 30693481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What sample sizes for reliability and validity studies in neurology?
Hobart JC; Cano SJ; Warner TT; Thompson AJ
J Neurol; 2012 Dec; 259(12):2681-94. PubMed ID: 22729386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two regression methods for estimation of a two-parameter Weibull distribution for reliability of dental materials.
Bütikofer L; Stawarczyk B; Roos M
Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):e33-50. PubMed ID: 25499248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simulation study comparing interval estimates for the recombination fraction.
Nemesure BB; Greenberg DA; Mendell NR
Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 8536952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Confidence intervals for the receiver operating characteristic area in studies with small samples.
Obuchowski NA; Lieber ML
Acad Radiol; 1998 Aug; 5(8):561-71. PubMed ID: 9702267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
