These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Integrity of the peer review process. Smith ER Can J Cardiol; 2000 Jun; 16(6):814. PubMed ID: 10863172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ensuring the quality of peer-review process. Afifi M Saudi Med J; 2006 Aug; 27(8):1253. PubMed ID: 16883466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing. Jefferson T; Shashok K Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Foot print of a paper: accountability in academic publishing. Mani H Lancet; 2016 Aug; 388(10044):562-3. PubMed ID: 27511782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process. Giles J Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Some rules for writing medical articles for peer-reviewed journals. Shah J Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2015 May; 97(4):252-4. PubMed ID: 26263929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Predatory publishing: What editors need to know. INANE Predatory Publishing Practices Collaborative CANNT J; 2015; 25(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 26882636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Readers' and author's responses to "are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?". Goldstone RA MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):70; author reply 70. PubMed ID: 16967523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]