These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11005901)

  • 1. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth.
    Manhart J; Neuerer P; Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Hickel R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11005901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays.
    Manhart J; Chen HY; Neuerer P; Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Hickel R
    Am J Dent; 2001 Apr; 14(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11507807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth.
    Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Manhart J; Kremers L; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 82(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 10512957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical study of indirect composite resin inlays in posterior stress-bearing cavities placed by dental students: results after 4 years.
    Huth KC; Chen HY; Mehl A; Hickel R; Manhart J
    J Dent; 2011 Jul; 39(7):478-88. PubMed ID: 21554920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
    da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One-year clinical evaluation of composite fillings and inlays in posterior teeth.
    Scheibenbogen A; Manhart J; Kunzelmann KH; Kremers L; Benz C; Hickel R
    Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Jun; 1(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 9552820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays.
    Manhart J; Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Chen HY; Hickel R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Dec; 4(4):192-8. PubMed ID: 11218488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth.
    Scheibenbogen A; Manhart J; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 9791786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Gianordoli Neto R; Santiago SL; Mendonça JS; Passos VF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin composite inlays.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8182195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short-term clinical evaluation of inlay and onlay restorations made with a ceromer.
    Monaco C; Baldissara P; dall'Orologio GD; Scotti R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 11842911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth.
    Can Say E; Kayahan B; Ozel E; Gokce K; Soyman M; Bayirli G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):17-25. PubMed ID: 16685291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
    Busato AL; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Carrilho MR
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report.
    Türkün LS; Aktener BO; Ateş M
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jun; 34(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 12859086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and SEM study of Tetric resin composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results.
    Krejci I; Besek M; Lutz F
    Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 9115675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.