292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11005906)
1. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11005906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems.
Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stress transfer of four mandibular implant overdenture cantilever designs.
Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 15507904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants.
Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bicortically stabilized implant load transfer.
Jeong CM; Caputo AA; Wylie RS; Son SC; Jeon YC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 12608670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro study of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: the influence of stud attachments on load transfer to the implant and soft tissue.
Ichikawa T; Horiuchi M; Wigianto R; Matsumoto N
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 8957878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture: effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution.
Assunção WG; Barão VA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Gomes EA; Delben JA
Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 19076244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
