These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11005906)

  • 21. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
    Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro stress analyses of dental implants supporting screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses.
    Kim WD; Jacobson Z; Nathanson D
    Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 10635156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Load Transfer Characteristics of Various Designs of Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures.
    Tokar E; Uludag B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1061-7. PubMed ID: 26394342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture.
    Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 15610541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a clinical trial of two anchorage systems.
    Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 9857597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
    Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A review of clinical and technical considerations for fixed and removable implant prostheses in the edentulous mandible.
    Zitzmann NU; Marinello CP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11887602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.
    Ochiai KT; Ozawa S; Caputo AA; Nishimura RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 12806328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Human ex vivo bone tissue strains around immediately-loaded implants supporting mandibular fixed prostheses.
    Kökat AM; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Akkocaoğlu M; Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Implant Dent; 2009 Apr; 18(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 19359867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of abutment's height and framework alloy on the load distribution of mandibular cantilevered implant-supported prosthesis.
    Suedam V; Souza EA; Moura MS; Jacques LB; Rubo JH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 19191796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
    Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a literature review.
    Sadowsky SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):468-73. PubMed ID: 11725274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Load Transfer Characteristics of Three-Implant-Retained Overdentures with Different Interimplant Distances.
    Tokar E; Uludag B; Karacaer O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 28291854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of platform switching on strain developed around implants supporting mandibular overdenture.
    Sabet ME; El-Korashy DI; El-Mahrouky NA
    Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 19667825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fabrication of a surgical template for implant/bar-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Fakhry A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Aug; 25(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 16089048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems.
    Payne AG; Solomons YF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 11203640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of attachment design on strains around implants supporting overdentures.
    Cekiç C; Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Jun; 38(6):e291-7. PubMed ID: 17625616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.