These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11005919)

  • 1. Microbial sulfate reduction in a liquid-solid fluidized bed reactor.
    Nagpal S; Chuichulcherm S; Peeva L; Livingston A
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2000 Nov; 70(4):370-80. PubMed ID: 11005919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of hydraulic retention time and sulfide toxicity on ethanol and acetate oxidation in sulfate-reducing metal-precipitating fluidized-bed reactor.
    Kaksonen AH; Franzmann PD; Puhakka JA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 May; 86(3):332-43. PubMed ID: 15083513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of hydraulic retention time on sulfate reduction in a carbon monoxide fed thermophilic gas lift reactor.
    Sipma J; Osuna MB; Lettinga G; Stams AJ; Lens PN
    Water Res; 2007 May; 41(9):1995-2003. PubMed ID: 17336364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thermophilic sulfate reduction and methanogenesis with methanol in a high rate anaerobic reactor.
    Weijma J; Stams AJ; Hulshoff Pol LW; Lettinga G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2000 Feb; 67(3):354-63. PubMed ID: 10620266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simple organic electron donors support diverse sulfate-reducing communities in fluidized-bed reactors treating acidic metal- and sulfate-containing wastewater.
    Kaksonen AH; Plumb JJ; Franzmann PD; Puhakka JA
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2004 Mar; 47(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 19712316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-rate ferric sulfate generation by a Leptospirillum ferriphilum-dominated biofilm and the role of jarosite in biomass retention in a fluidized-bed reactor.
    Kinnunen PH; Puhakka JA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 Mar; 85(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 14991647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of a down-flow fluidized bed reactor under sulfate reduction conditions using volatile fatty acids as electron donors.
    Celis-García LB; Razo-Flores E; Monroy O
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Jul; 97(4):771-9. PubMed ID: 17154309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural network prediction of thermophilic (65 degrees C) sulfidogenic fluidized-bed reactor performance for the treatment of metal-containing wastewater.
    Sahinkaya E; Ozkaya B; Kaksonen AH; Puhakka JA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Jul; 97(4):780-7. PubMed ID: 17154306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhanced sulfate reduction with acidogenic sulfate-reducing bacteria.
    Wang A; Ren N; Wang X; Lee D
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jun; 154(1-3):1060-5. PubMed ID: 18093734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anaerobic degradation of landfill leachate using an upflow anaerobic fixed-bed reactor with microbial sulfate reduction.
    Thabet OB; Bouallagui H; Cayol JL; Ollivier B; Fardeau ML; Hamdi M
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Aug; 167(1-3):1133-40. PubMed ID: 19272702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethanol and toluene removal in a horizontal-flow anaerobic immobilized biomass reactor in the presence of sulfate.
    Cattony EB; Chinalia FA; Ribeiro R; Zaiat M; Foresti E; Varesche MB
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Jul; 91(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 15915510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethanol utilization by sulfate-reducing bacteria: an experimental and modeling study.
    Nagpal S; Chuichulcherm S; Livingston A; Peeva L
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2000 Dec; 70(5):533-43. PubMed ID: 11042550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biodesulfurization of flue gases and other sulfate/sulfite waste streams using immobilized mixed sulfate-reducing bacteria.
    Selvaraj PT; Little MH; Kaufman EN
    Biotechnol Prog; 1997; 13(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 9376112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuous adsorption and recovery of Cr(VI) in different types of reactors.
    Bai SR; Abraham TE
    Biotechnol Prog; 2005; 21(6):1692-9. PubMed ID: 16321053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of population dynamics in sulfate-reducing consortia on exposure to sulfate.
    Icgen B; Harrison S
    Res Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 157(10):922-7. PubMed ID: 17008063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sulfidogenic fluidized-bed treatment of metal-containing wastewater at low and high temperatures.
    Sahinkaya E; Ozkaya B; Kaksonen AH; Puhakka JA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Apr; 96(6):1064-72. PubMed ID: 17004272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anaerobic treatment for C and S removal in "zero-discharge" paper mills: effects of process design on S removal efficiencies.
    van Lier JB; Lens PN; Pol LW
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 11575084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Activity test for biological sulfate reduction.
    Pawels R; Haridas A; Jose BT
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2007 Jan; 49(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 18472554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance evaluation of various aerobic biological systems for the treatment of domestic wastewater at low temperatures.
    Sundaresan N; Philip L
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(4):819-30. PubMed ID: 18776617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.