BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

946 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11007387)

  • 1. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
    Alderman AK; Wilkins EG; Lowery JC; Kim M; Davis JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 106(4):769-76. PubMed ID: 11007387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study.
    Alderman AK; Kuhn LE; Lowery JC; Wilkins EG
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jan; 204(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 17189107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study.
    Wilkins EG; Cederna PS; Lowery JC; Davis JA; Kim HM; Roth RS; Goldfarb S; Izenberg PH; Houin HP; Shaheen KW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Oct; 106(5):1014-25; discussion 1026-7. PubMed ID: 11039373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determinants of aesthetic satisfaction following TRAM and implant breast reconstruction.
    Shaikh-Naidu N; Preminger BA; Rogers K; Messina P; Gayle LB
    Ann Plast Surg; 2004 May; 52(5):465-70; discussion 470. PubMed ID: 15096928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques.
    Yueh JH; Slavin SA; Adesiyun T; Nyame TT; Gautam S; Morris DJ; Tobias AM; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jun; 125(6):1585-1595. PubMed ID: 20517080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The efficacy of the surgical delay procedure in pedicle TRAM breast reconstruction.
    Atisha D; Alderman AK; Janiga T; Singal B; Wilkins EG
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Oct; 63(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 19770703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: comparison of three common procedures.
    Saulis AS; Mustoe TA; Fine NA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 May; 119(6):1669-1676. PubMed ID: 17440339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A two-year prospective analysis of trunk function in TRAM breast reconstructions.
    Alderman AK; Kuzon WM; Wilkins EG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Jun; 117(7):2131-8. PubMed ID: 16772906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Institutional review of free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
    Knight MA; Nguyen DT; Kobayashi MR; Evans GR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Jun; 56(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 16721068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction.
    Kronowitz SJ; Hunt KK; Kuerer HM; Babiera G; McNeese MD; Buchholz TA; Strom EA; Robb GL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 May; 113(6):1617-28. PubMed ID: 15114121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A retrospective analysis of outcomes using three common methods for immediate breast reconstruction.
    Spear SL; Newman MK; Bedford MS; Schwartz KA; Cohen M; Schwartz JS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Aug; 122(2):340-347. PubMed ID: 18626348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.
    Bennett KG; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
    JAMA Surg; 2018 Oct; 153(10):901-908. PubMed ID: 29926077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of immediate and delayed free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy.
    Tran NV; Chang DW; Gupta A; Kroll SS; Robb GL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Jul; 108(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 11420508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic review of abdominal wall function following abdominal flaps for postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
    Atisha D; Alderman AK
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Aug; 63(2):222-30. PubMed ID: 19593108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study.
    Alderman AK; Wilkins EG; Kim HM; Lowery JC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jun; 109(7):2265-74. PubMed ID: 12045548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction followed by post-mastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer: Aesthetic, surgical, satisfaction and quality of life outcomes in women with high-risk breast cancer.
    Brennan ME; Flitcroft K; Warrier S; Snook K; Spillane AJ
    Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():59-65. PubMed ID: 27611237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications.
    Spear SL; Onyewu C
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Mar; 105(3):930-42. PubMed ID: 10724252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survey assessment of physical function following postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
    Brockhurst AC; Alderman AK; Lowery JC; Davis JA; Wilkins EG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Apr; 121(4):1108-1115. PubMed ID: 18349627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship Period.
    Hu ES; Pusic AL; Waljee JF; Kuhn L; Hawley ST; Wilkins E; Alderman AK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Jul; 124(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19568038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.
    Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.