These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11007643)

  • 1. Experimental evidence that group foragers can converge on predicted producer-scrounger equilibria.
    Mottley K; Giraldeau LA
    Anim Behav; 2000 Sep; 60(3):341-350. PubMed ID: 11007643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Daily Patterns of Optimal Producer and Scrounger Use under Predation Hazard: A State-Dependent Dynamic Game Analysis.
    Barta Z; Giraldeau LA
    Am Nat; 2000 Apr; 155(4):570-582. PubMed ID: 10753082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning rules for social foragers: implications for the producer-scrounger game and ideal free distribution theory.
    Beauchamp G
    J Theor Biol; 2000 Nov; 207(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 11027477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stable producer-scrounger dynamics in wild birds: sociability and learning speed covary with scrounging behaviour.
    Aplin LM; Morand-Ferron J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Apr; 284(1852):. PubMed ID: 28404775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in plasticity and sampling when playing behavioural games.
    Morand-Ferron J; Varennes E; Giraldeau LA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Apr; 278(1709):1223-30. PubMed ID: 20943695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The patch distributed producer-scrounger game.
    Ohtsuka Y; Toquenaga Y
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 19501599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of prior residence and pair bond on scrounging choices in flocks of zebra finches, Taenopygia guttata.
    Beauchamp G
    Behav Processes; 2000 Dec; 52(2-3):131-140. PubMed ID: 11164681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Food exploitation: searching for the optimal joining policy.
    Giraldeau LA; Beauchamp G
    Trends Ecol Evol; 1999 Mar; 14(3):102-106. PubMed ID: 10322509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game.
    Reichert MS; Morand-Ferron J; Kulahci IG; Firth JA; Davidson GL; Crofts SJ; Quinn JL
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Nov; 90(11):2497-2509. PubMed ID: 34091901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evolutionary perspective on social inequality and health disparities: Insights from the producer-scrounger game.
    Wells JCK
    Evol Med Public Health; 2023; 11(1):294-308. PubMed ID: 37680454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of personality on social foraging: shy barnacle geese scrounge more.
    Kurvers RH; Prins HH; van Wieren SE; van Oers K; Nolet BA; Ydenberg RC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Feb; 277(1681):601-8. PubMed ID: 19864281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An asymmetric producer-scrounger game: body size and the social foraging behavior of coho salmon.
    Phillips JA; Peacock SJ; Bateman A; Bartlett M; Lewis MA; Krkošek M
    Theor Ecol; 2018; 11(4):417-431. PubMed ID: 30931016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skill trade-offs promote persistent individual differences and specialized tactics.
    Dubois F
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e10578. PubMed ID: 37809359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. LEARNING TO CHOOSE AMONG SOCIAL FORAGING STRATEGIES IN ADULT HOUSE SPARROWS (Passer domesticus).
    Belmaker A; Motro U; Feldman MW; Lotem A
    Ethology; 2012 Nov; 118(11):1111-1121. PubMed ID: 23226911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guides and cheats: producer-scrounger dynamics in the human-honeyguide mutualism.
    Cram DL; Lloyd-Jones DJ; van der Wal JEM; Lund J; Buanachique IO; Muamedi M; Nanguar CI; Ngovene A; Raveh S; Boner W; Spottiswoode CN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Nov; 290(2010):20232024. PubMed ID: 37935365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the importance of accounting for alternative foraging tactics when assessing cognitive performance in wild animals.
    Vernouillet A
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Nov; 90(11):2474-2477. PubMed ID: 34734419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scrounger numbers and the inhibition of social learning in pigeons.
    Lefebvre L; Helder R
    Behav Processes; 1997 Sep; 40(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 24895881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning in a game context: strategy choice by some keeps learning from evolving in others.
    Dubois F; Morand-Ferron J; Giraldeau LA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Dec; 277(1700):3609-16. PubMed ID: 20573623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patch departure decisions by spice finches foraging singly or in groups.
    Livoreil B; Giraldeau La
    Anim Behav; 1997 Oct; 54(4):967-77. PubMed ID: 9344448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consequences of multiple simultaneous opportunities to exploit others' efforts on free riding.
    Dubois F; Richard-Dionne É
    Ecol Evol; 2020 May; 10(10):4343-4351. PubMed ID: 32489601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.