These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11008799)

  • 1. Effective impedance of rough porous ground surfaces.
    Attenborough K; Waters-Fuller T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):949-56. PubMed ID: 11008799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective impedance spectra for predicting rough sea effects on atmospheric impulsive sounds.
    Boulanger P; Attenborough K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):751-62. PubMed ID: 15759695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diffraction assisted rough ground effect: models and data.
    Bashir I; Taherzadeh S; Attenborough K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1281-92. PubMed ID: 23464001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Roughness characterization of porous soil with acoustic backscatter.
    Oelze ML; Sabatier JM; Raspet R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):1826-32. PubMed ID: 11386537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic scattering by a three-dimensional elastic object near a rough surface.
    Lim R; Williams KL; Thorsos EI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1246-62. PubMed ID: 10738781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deduction of the acoustic impedance of the ground via a simulated three-dimensional microphone array.
    Alberts WC; Sanchez KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL471-6. PubMed ID: 24181993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the inadvisability of using single parameter impedance models for representing the acoustical properties of ground surfaces.
    Dragna D; Attenborough K; Blanc-Benon P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):2399-413. PubMed ID: 26520321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics study of the roughness effect on contact angle and droplet flow.
    Shigorina E; Kordilla J; Tartakovsky AM
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Sep; 96(3-1):033115. PubMed ID: 29346900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A time domain rough surface scattering model based on wedge diffraction: application to low-frequency backscattering from two-dimensional sea surfaces.
    Keiffer RS; Novarini JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 10641617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reflective properties of randomly rough surfaces under large incidence angles.
    Qiu J; Zhang WJ; Liu LH; Hsu PF; Liu LJ
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2014 Jun; 31(6):1251-8. PubMed ID: 24977364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linear systems formulation of scattering theory for rough surfaces with arbitrary incident and scattering angles.
    Krywonos A; Harvey JE; Choi N
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2011 Jun; 28(6):1121-38. PubMed ID: 21643398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thermodynamic modeling of contact angles on rough, heterogeneous surfaces.
    Long J; Hyder MN; Huang RY; Chen P
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2005 Dec; 118(1-3):173-90. PubMed ID: 16154106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impedance measurements around grazing incidence for nonlocally reacting thin porous layers.
    Allard JF; Henry M; Gareton V; Jansens G; Lauriks W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1210-5. PubMed ID: 12656355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noise reduction in tunnels by hard rough surfaces.
    Law MK; Li KM; Leung CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):961-72. PubMed ID: 18681588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Input impedance matching of acoustic transducers operating at off-resonant frequencies.
    Son KT; Lee CC
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Dec; 57(12):2784-94. PubMed ID: 21156374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Model and experimental studies for contact angles of surfactant solutions on rough and smooth hydrophobic surfaces.
    Milne AJ; Elliott JA; Zabeti P; Zhou J; Amirfazli A
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2011 Sep; 13(36):16208-19. PubMed ID: 21822523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surfactant solutions and porous substrates: spreading and imbibition.
    Starov VM
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2004 Nov; 111(1-2):3-27. PubMed ID: 15571660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Approximate impedance models for point-to-point sound propagation over acoustically-hard ground containing rectangular grooves.
    Mellish S; Taherzadeh S; Attenborough K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jan; 147(1):74. PubMed ID: 32007012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reflection of ultrasound from partially contacting rough surfaces.
    Thomas R; Drinkwater BW; Liaptsis D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):638-45. PubMed ID: 15759684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A note on the effects of roughness on acoustic propagation past curved rough surfaces.
    Whelan A; Chambers JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):EL231-5. PubMed ID: 19507927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.