These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

559 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11008820)

  • 1. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences.
    Grant KW; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1197-208. PubMed ID: 11008820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.
    Grant KW; Walden BE; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. PubMed ID: 9604361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single band amplitude envelope cues as an aid to speechreading.
    Grant KW; Braida LD; Renn RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):621-45. PubMed ID: 1775660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults.
    Sommers MS; Tye-Murray N; Spehar B
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 15937408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A single-band envelope cue as a supplement to speechreading of segmentals: a comparison of auditory versus tactual presentation.
    Bratakos MS; Reed CM; Delhorne LA; Denesvich G
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 11409858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Dorman MF; Liss J; Wang S; Berisha V; Ludwig C; Natale SC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 59(6):1505-1519. PubMed ID: 27960006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validating a Method to Assess Lipreading, Audiovisual Gain, and Integration During Speech Reception With Cochlear-Implanted and Normal-Hearing Subjects Using a Talking Head.
    Schreitmüller S; Frenken M; Bentz L; Ortmann M; Walger M; Meister H
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):503-516. PubMed ID: 29068860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory supplements to speechreading: combining amplitude envelope cues from different spectral regions of speech.
    Grant KW; Braida LD; Renn RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1065-73. PubMed ID: 8132900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Intermodal timing cues for audio-visual speech recognition].
    Hashimoto M; Kumashiro M
    J UOEH; 2004 Jun; 26(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 15244074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Lalonde K; McCreery RW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):705-719. PubMed ID: 32032226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of simulated cataracts on speech intelligibility.
    Morris NL; Chaparro A; Downs D; Wood JM
    Vision Res; 2012 Aug; 66():49-54. PubMed ID: 22750022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential Auditory and Visual Phase-Locking Are Observed during Audio-Visual Benefit and Silent Lip-Reading for Speech Perception.
    Aller M; Økland HS; MacGregor LJ; Blank H; Davis MH
    J Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 42(31):6108-6120. PubMed ID: 35760528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory and auditory-visual perception of clear and conversational speech.
    Helfer KS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 40(2):432-43. PubMed ID: 9130211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Text as a Supplement to Speech in Young and Older Adults.
    Krull V; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 26458131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Visual Speech Envelope on Audiovisual Speech Perception in Multitalker Listening Environments.
    Yuan Y; Meyers K; Borges K; Lleo Y; Fiorentino KA; Oh Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 64(7):2845-2853. PubMed ID: 34100628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.