136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11009249)
1. Similarity and inhibition in long-term memory: evidence for a two-factor theory.
Anderson MC; Green C; McCulloch KC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1141-59. PubMed ID: 11009249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall: competitor interference revisited.
Verde MF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1433-48. PubMed ID: 23687918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrophysiological correlates of competitor activation predict retrieval-induced forgetting.
Hellerstedt R; Johansson M
Cereb Cortex; 2014 Jun; 24(6):1619-29. PubMed ID: 23365212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of distinctive processing on retrieval-induced forgetting.
Smith RE; Hunt RR
Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 10946533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrieval-induced forgetting: evidence for a recall-specific mechanism.
Anderson MC; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):522-30. PubMed ID: 11082860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Forgetting our facts: the role of inhibitory processes in the loss of propositional knowledge.
Anderson MC; Bell T
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Sep; 130(3):544-70. PubMed ID: 11561927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrieval-induced forgetting without competition: testing the retrieval specificity assumption of the inhibition theory.
Raaijmakers JG; Jakab E
Mem Cognit; 2012 Jan; 40(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 21811888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gone but not forgotten: the transient nature of retrieval-induced forgetting.
MacLeod MD; Macrae CN
Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 11340924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective memory retrieval can impair and improve retrieval of other memories.
Bäuml KH; Samenieh A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):488-94. PubMed ID: 21942495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does inhibition cause forgetting after selective retrieval? A reanalysis and failure to replicate.
Potter KW; Huszar LD; Huber DE
Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():26-45. PubMed ID: 29715583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrieval induces forgetting, but only when nontested items compete for retrieval: Implication for interference, inhibition, and context reinstatement.
Chan JC; Erdman MR; Davis SD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1298-315. PubMed ID: 25621869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.
Butler KM; Williams CC; Zacks RT; Maki RH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 11550757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neural Differentiation Tracks Improved Recall of Competing Memories Following Interleaved Study and Retrieval Practice.
Hulbert JC; Norman KA
Cereb Cortex; 2015 Oct; 25(10):3994-4008. PubMed ID: 25477369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the role of item similarity in retrieval-induced forgetting.
Bäuml KH; Hartinger A
Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 11958725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cue-independent forgetting by intentional suppression - Evidence for inhibition as the mechanism of intentional forgetting.
Wang Y; Cao Z; Zhu Z; Cai H; Wu Y
Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():31-5. PubMed ID: 26113446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dissociating the two faces of selective memory retrieval.
Dobler IM; Bäuml KH
Memory; 2012 Jul; 20(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 22639961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low involvement of preexisting associations makes retrieval-induced forgetting long lasting.
Ortega A; Gómez-Ariza CJ; Morales J; Bajo MT
Cogn Process; 2015 May; 16(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 25838256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Explaining retrieval-induced forgetting: A change in mental context between the study and restudy practice phases is not sufficient to cause forgetting.
Buchli DR; Storm BC; Bjork RA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(6):1197-209. PubMed ID: 26241795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Limits of the retrieval-inhibition construct: list segregation in directed forgetting.
Wilson SP; Kipp K; Chapman K
J Gen Psychol; 2003 Oct; 130(4):359-79. PubMed ID: 14672100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
