These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11010604)

  • 1. Using economic evaluations to make formulary coverage decisions. So much for guidelines.
    Anis AH; Gagnon Y
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2000 Jul; 18(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11010604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using pharmacoeconomic analysis to make drug insurance coverage decisions.
    Anis AH; Rahman T; Schechter MT
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1998 Jan; 13(1 Pt 2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10176146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of pharmacoeconomic evaluations submitted for reimbursement in Korea.
    Yim EY; Lim SH; Oh MJ; Park HK; Gong JR; Park SE; Yi SY
    Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S104-10. PubMed ID: 22265055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of clinical and economic evidence in dossier formulary submissions.
    Colmenero F; Sullivan SD; Palmer JA; Brauer CA; Bungay K; Watkins J; Neumann PJ
    Am J Manag Care; 2007 Jul; 13(7):401-7. PubMed ID: 17620035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of pharmacoeconomic guidelines for formulary approval: the Australian experience.
    Langley PC
    Clin Ther; 1993; 15(6):1154-76; discussion 1120. PubMed ID: 8111812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Opinions regarding the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy dossier submission guidelines: results of a small survey of managed care organizations and pharmaceutical manufacturers.
    Nichol MB; Knight TK; Epstein J; Honda DH; Tretiak R
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2007 May; 13(4):360-71. PubMed ID: 17506602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological quality of economic evaluations of new pharmaceuticals in The Netherlands.
    Hoomans T; Severens JL; van der Roer N; Delwel GO
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Mar; 30(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 22074610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cost-effectiveness of new drugs impacts reimbursement decision making but room for improvement].
    Hoomans T; van der Roer N; Severens JL; Delwel GO
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A958. PubMed ID: 20699045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Managed care guidelines for the economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals.
    Langley PC; Martin RE
    Am J Manag Care; 1997 Jul; 3(7):1013-21. PubMed ID: 10173366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Institutional formularies: the relevance of pharmacoeconomic analysis to formulary decisions.
    Lipsy RJ
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1992 Apr; 1(4):265-81. PubMed ID: 10147017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ontario's formulary committee: how recommendations are made.
    PausJenssen AM; Singer PA; Detsky AS
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2003; 21(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 12600223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing patient access to pharmaceuticals in the UK and US.
    Cohen J; Cairns C; Paquette C; Faden L
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2006; 5(3):177-87. PubMed ID: 17132032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness analysis and the formulary decision-making process.
    Wang Z; Salmon JW; Walton SM
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2004; 10(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 14720105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative review of the pharmacoeconomic guidelines in South Africa.
    Carapinha JL
    J Med Econ; 2017 Jan; 20(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 27564849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Need for an improved submission process for listing drugs for reimbursement in Canadian provinces.
    West R; Borden EK; Collet JP; Rawson NS; Tonks RS
    Can J Clin Pharmacol; 2003; 10(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 14712327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pharmacoeconomics and formulary decision making.
    Sanchez LA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1996; 9 Suppl 1():16-25. PubMed ID: 10160112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AMCP Format dossier requests: manufacturer response and formulary implications for one large health plan.
    Spooner JJ; Gandhi PK; Connelly SB
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2007; 13(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17269835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Format for Formulary Submissions: an evolving standard--a Foundation for Managed Care Pharmacy Task Force report.
    Fry RN; Avey SG; Sullivan SD
    Value Health; 2003; 6(5):505-21. PubMed ID: 14627057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidelines for conducting pharmaceutical budget impact analyses for submission to public drug plans in Canada.
    Marshall DA; Douglas PR; Drummond MF; Torrance GW; Macleod S; Manti O; Cheruvu L; Corvari R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(6):477-95. PubMed ID: 18489199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.