BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11011299)

  • 21. An overview of the Swedish randomised mammography trials: total mortality pattern and the representivity of the study cohorts.
    Nystrom L; Larsson LG; Wall S; Rutqvist LE; Andersson I; Bjurstam N; Fagerberg G; Frisell J; Tabar L
    J Med Screen; 1996; 3(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 8849766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Age-specific effectiveness of the Nijmegen population-based breast cancer-screening program: assessment of early indicators of screening effectiveness.
    Peer PG; Holland R; Hendriks JH; Mravunac M; Verbeek AL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Mar; 86(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 8120918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk.
    Saftlas AF; Wolfe JN; Hoover RN; Brinton LA; Schairer C; Salane M; Szklo M
    Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Mar; 129(3):518-26. PubMed ID: 2916545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of breast cancer screening after age 65.
    Chen HH; Tabar L; Fagerberg G; Duffy SW
    J Med Screen; 1995; 2(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 7497137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Epidemiologic determinants of the mammographic parenchymal pattern. A population-based study within a mammographic screening program.
    Bergkvist L; Tabàr L; Bergström R; Adami HO
    Am J Epidemiol; 1987 Dec; 126(6):1075-81. PubMed ID: 3687919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.
    Andersson I; Aspegren K; Janzon L; Landberg T; Lindholm K; Linell F; Ljungberg O; Ranstam J; Sigfússon B
    BMJ; 1988 Oct; 297(6654):943-8. PubMed ID: 3142562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A prospective study of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk in a screening experience.
    Ciatto S; Zappa M
    Eur J Radiol; 1993 Sep; 17(2):122-5. PubMed ID: 8223680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit.
    Tabar L; Fagerberg G; Duffy SW; Day NE
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1989 Jun; 43(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 2512366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Breast cancer in East Anglia: the impact of the breast screening programme on stage at diagnosis.
    McCann J; Stockton D; Day N
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 9575460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mammographic screening in older women. Is it worthwhile?
    van Dijck JA; Broeders MJ; Verbeek AL
    Drugs Aging; 1997 Feb; 10(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 9061265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New Swedish breast cancer detection results for women aged 40-49.
    Tabar L; Duffy SW; Burhenne LW
    Cancer; 1993 Aug; 72(4 Suppl):1437-48. PubMed ID: 8339236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of repeated mammographic screening on breast cancer stage distribution. Results from a randomised study of 92 934 women in a Swedish county.
    Fagerberg G; Baldetorp L; Gröntoft O; Lundström B; Månson JC; Nordenskjöld B
    Acta Radiol Oncol; 1985; 24(6):465-73. PubMed ID: 3006435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Swedish randomised mammography screening trials: analysis of their effect on the breast cancer related excess mortality.
    Larsson LG; Nyström L; Wall S; Rutqvist L; Andersson I; Bjurstam N; Fagerberg G; Frisell J; Tabár L
    J Med Screen; 1996; 3(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 8946307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mammographic breast cancer screening--a randomized trial in Malmö, Sweden.
    Andersson I; Janzon L; Sigfússon BF
    Maturitas; 1985 May; 7(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 2991708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interval cancers and cancers in non-attenders in the Ostergötland Mammographic Screening Programme. Duration between screening and diagnosis, S-phase fraction and distant recurrence.
    Vitak B; Stål O; Månson JC; Thomas BA; Arnesson LG; Ekelund L; Måre K; Nordenskjöld B; Källström AC; Bång H
    Eur J Cancer; 1997 Aug; 33(9):1453-60. PubMed ID: 9337689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Early detection of breast cancer.
    Threatt B
    J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 1992; 47(5):152-4. PubMed ID: 1460216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A case-control evaluation of the effect of breast cancer screening in the United Kingdom trial of early detection of breast cancer.
    Moss SM; Summerley ME; Thomas BT; Ellman R; Chamberlain JO
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Aug; 46(4):362-4. PubMed ID: 1431707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interval cancers and sensitivity in the screening centres of the UK trial of early detection of breast cancer.
    Moss SM; Coleman DA; Ellman R; Chamberlain J; Forrest AP; Kirkpatrick AE; Thomas BA; Price JL
    Eur J Cancer; 1993; 29A(2):255-8. PubMed ID: 8422291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The diagnosis of breast cancer: a clinical and mammographic comparison.
    Day PJ; O'Rourke MG
    Med J Aust; 1990 Jun; 152(12):635-9. PubMed ID: 2198443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Breast screening, prognostic factors and survival--results from the Swedish two county study.
    Duffy SW; Tabar L; Fagerberg G; Gad A; Gröntoft O; South MC; Day NE
    Br J Cancer; 1991 Dec; 64(6):1133-8. PubMed ID: 1764377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.