These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11011300)

  • 1. [Breast cancer screening and medical consumption].
    Riou F; Piette C; Evrard MY; Durand G; Bohec C; De Korvin B
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Aug; 48(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 11011300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography screening: prospects and opportunity costs.
    Navarro AM; Kaplan RM
    Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):209-33. PubMed ID: 9421557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammography screening under 50: a limited perspective on a multifaceted issue.
    Royak-Schaler R; Gallant SJ; Klabunde CN
    Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):243-9; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9421559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: An invited review of the benefits and costs.
    Greif JM
    Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 20371181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cost-effectiveness of mammography screening: evidence from a microsimulation model for New Zealand.
    Szeto KL; Devlin NJ
    Health Policy; 1996 Nov; 38(2):101-15. PubMed ID: 10160378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mobile mammography: assessment of self-referral in reaching medically underserved women.
    Peek ME; Han J
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2007 Apr; 99(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 17444429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a church-based intervention to promote mammography screening.
    Stockdale SE; Keeler E; Duan N; Derose KP; Fox SA
    Health Serv Res; 2000 Dec; 35(5 Pt 1):1037-57. PubMed ID: 11130802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with the use of breast and cervical cancer screening services among Chinese women in Hong Kong.
    Abdullah AS; Leung TY
    Public Health; 2001 May; 115(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 11429718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of "free" mammograms in motivating first-time screening: a community experiment.
    Scammon DL; Smith JA; Beard T
    J Ambul Care Mark; 1995; 6(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 10170371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Economic approach to breast cancer screening in Belgium].
    Grivegnée AR; Autier P
    Rev Med Brux; 2001 Sep; 22(4):A277-81. PubMed ID: 11680188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A quest for quality and economic effectiveness throughout the continuum of breast care.
    La Fargue MM; Coleman C
    Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):251-2. PubMed ID: 20392641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast and cervical cancer screening among low-income women in Nebraska: findings from the Every Woman Matters program, 1993-2004.
    Feresu SA; Zhang W; Puumala SE; Ullrich F; Anderson JR
    J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2008 Aug; 19(3):797-813. PubMed ID: 18677071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk assessment, screening and prevention of breast cancer: A look at cost-effectiveness.
    Lebovic GS; Hollingsworth A; Feig SA
    Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 20399656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To what extent is women's economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010.
    Menvielle G; Richard JB; Ringa V; Dray-Spira R; Beck F
    Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 24842393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Women's views of a breast screening service.
    Hamilton EL; Wallis MG; Barlow J; Cullen L; Wright C
    Health Care Women Int; 2003 Jan; 24(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 12746030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Women's health and managed care: promises and challenges.
    Collins KS; Simon LJ
    Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 8907846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mammological service in the Russian Federation].
    Rozhkova NI
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2002; (5):56-61. PubMed ID: 12622041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast care: a new way.
    Kneece J
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Sep; 13(9):20-2, 24, 29. PubMed ID: 10138357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a protocol for evaluation of mammographic surveillance services in women under 50 with a family history of breast cancer.
    Mackay J; Rogers C; Fielder H; Blamey R; Macmillan D; Boggis C; Brown J; Pharoah PD; Moss S; Day NE; Myles J; Austoker J; Gray J; Cuzick J; Duffy SW
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2001; 6(5):365-9; discussion 371-5. PubMed ID: 11822726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Women's satisfaction with breast and gynecological cancer screening.
    Foxall MJ; Barron CR; Houfek J
    Women Health; 2003; 38(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 14535604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.