BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11011905)

  • 1. Development of a random response scale for the multiple affect adjective check list-revised.
    Van Whitlock R; Lubin B; George-Curran R
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):339-42. PubMed ID: 11011905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Construction of validity scales for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised.
    Van Whitlock R; Lubin B
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Feb; 86(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 9530716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A grade four reading level key for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised.
    Lubin B; Van Whitlock R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Feb; 86(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 9530719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometric properties of the grade 4 reading level Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised with offenders.
    Van Whitlock R; Lubin B
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Apr; 86(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 9638753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A grade-six reading level key for the multiple affect adjective check list-revised.
    Lubin B; Van Whitlock R; Rea MR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):883-9. PubMed ID: 8668447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Additional study of the Youth-Depression Adjective Check List.
    Lubin B; Cameron K; Van Whitlock R; Carey MP
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Feb; 90(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 10769891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response manipulation on the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised.
    Lubin B; Van Whitlock R; Rea M; Petren S
    Assessment; 1998 Jun; 5(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 9626386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Japanese version of the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist-Revised: development and validation.
    Yasuda T; Lubin B; Kim J; Van Whitlock R
    J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jan; 59(1):93-109. PubMed ID: 12508334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective prediction of college adjustment using self- and informant-rated personality traits.
    Kurtz JE; Puher MA; Cross NA
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 22489598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structure of personality disorders from the perspective of the Revised Neo Personality Inventory domain scales and the Psychopathology-5 Scales.
    Byravan A; Ramanaiah NV
    Psychol Rep; 1999 Dec; 85(3 Pt 2):1119-22. PubMed ID: 10710968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personality traits and achievement motives: theoretical and empirical relations between the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised and the Achievement Motives Scale.
    Diseth A; Martinsen Ø
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Apr; 104(2):579-92. PubMed ID: 19610488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria.
    Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA; Berry DT
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Jun; 74(3):472-88. PubMed ID: 10900573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring the poles of negative and positive mood using the Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule and Activation Deactivation Adjective Check List.
    Nemanick RC; Munz DC
    Psychol Rep; 1994 Feb; 74(1):195-9. PubMed ID: 8153211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examination of relations between the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised and the Temperament and Character Inventory.
    MacDonald DA; Holland D
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):921-30. PubMed ID: 12530745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the universal structure of personality in early adolescence: The NEO-PI-R and NEO-PI-3 in 24 cultures.
    De Fruyt F; De Bolle M; McCrae RR; Terracciano A; Costa PT;
    Assessment; 2009 Sep; 16(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 19419953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intercorrelations of scores on the SONSO Personality Inventory and on the Gordon Personal Profile and Inventory.
    Kentle RL
    Psychol Rep; 1996 Feb; 78(1):255-8. PubMed ID: 8839316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semantic response consistency and protocol validity in structured personality assessment: the case of the NEO-PI-R.
    Kurtz JE; Parrish CL
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Apr; 76(2):315-32. PubMed ID: 11393463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factorial structure and internal consistency of the German TEMPS-A scale: validation against the NEO-FFI questionnaire.
    Blöink R; Brieger P; Akiskal HS; Marneros A
    J Affect Disord; 2005 Mar; 85(1-2):77-83. PubMed ID: 15780678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The sexual sensation seeking scale: reliability and validity within a heterosexual college student sample.
    Gaither GA; Sellbom M
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Oct; 81(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 12946922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A hostility scale for the California Psychological Inventory: MMPI, observer Q-sort, and big-five correlates.
    Adams SH; John OP
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Oct; 69(2):408-24. PubMed ID: 9392898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.