These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11012006)

  • 1. Measurement of sensory irritation of the skin.
    Green BG
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Sep; 11(3):170-80. PubMed ID: 11012006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin.
    Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 15059175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment. 1. Skin irritation.
    Fluhr JW; Darlenski R; Angelova-Fischer I; Tsankov N; Basketter D
    Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2008; 21(3):124-35. PubMed ID: 18523410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of an in vitro corrosion/irritation prediction assay using the EpiDerm skin model.
    Kidd DA; Johnson M; Clements J
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2007 Oct; 21(7):1292-7. PubMed ID: 17936572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products.
    Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 15059174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The vulvar epithelium differs from the skin: implications for cutaneous testing to address topical vulvar exposures.
    Farage M; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Oct; 51(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 15500670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Behind-the-Knee test: an efficient model for evaluating mechanical and chemical irritation.
    Farage MA
    Skin Res Technol; 2006 May; 12(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 16626379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Irritants in combination with a synergistic or additive effect on the skin response: an overview of tandem irritation studies.
    Kartono F; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Jun; 54(6):303-12. PubMed ID: 16787451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Harmonization of thresholds for primary skin irritation from results of human repeated insult patch tests and laboratory animal skin irritation tests.
    Tardiff RG; Hubner RP; Graves CG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2003; 23(4):279-81. PubMed ID: 12884413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociation of phantom limb phenomena from stump tactile spatial acuity and sensory thresholds.
    Hunter JP; Katz J; Davis KD
    Brain; 2005 Feb; 128(Pt 2):308-20. PubMed ID: 15634736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensory nerves, neurogenic inflammation and pain: missing components of alternative irritation strategies? A review and a potential strategy.
    Garle MJ; Fry JR
    Altern Lab Anim; 2003; 31(3):295-316. PubMed ID: 15612874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. KeraSkin-VM: a novel reconstructed human epidermis model for skin irritation tests.
    Jung KM; Lee SH; Jang WH; Jung HS; Heo Y; Park YH; Bae S; Lim KM; Seok SH
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Aug; 28(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 24625437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro skin irritation: facts and future. State of the art review of mechanisms and models.
    Welss T; Basketter DA; Schröder KR
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2004 Jun; 18(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 15046769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensations evoked by selective mechanical, chemical, and thermal stimulation of the conjunctiva and cornea.
    Acosta MC; Tan ME; Belmonte C; Gallar J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Aug; 42(9):2063-7. PubMed ID: 11481273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative assessment of the acute skin irritation potential of detergent formulations using a novel human 4-h patch test method.
    Robinson MK; Kruszewski FH; Al-Atrash J; Blazka ME; Gingell R; Heitfeld FA; Mallon D; Snyder NK; Swanson JE; Casterton PL
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Dec; 43(12):1703-12. PubMed ID: 16026914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitive skin: an overview.
    Inamadar AC; Palit A
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2013; 79(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23254724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensory perception and neuroanatomical structures in normal and grafted skin of burn survivors.
    Nedelec B; Hou Q; Sohbi I; Choinière M; Beauregard G; Dykes RW
    Burns; 2005 Nov; 31(7):817-30. PubMed ID: 16199293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The usefulness of toxicogenomics for predicting acute skin irritation on in vitro reconstructed human epidermis.
    Borlon C; Godard P; Eskes C; Hartung T; Zuang V; Toussaint O
    Toxicology; 2007 Nov; 241(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 17928126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rat epidermal keratinocyte organotypic culture (ROC) as a model for chemically induced skin irritation testing.
    Pappinen S; Pasonen-Seppänen S; Suhonen M; Tammi R; Urtti A
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Nov; 208(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 16239167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Irritant contact dermatitis. Part II. Evaluation evaluation of skin irritation potential of chemicals].
    Chomiczewska D; Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B
    Med Pr; 2009; 60(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 19746889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.