These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11012057)

  • 1. In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices.
    Kanayama M; Cunningham BW; Haggerty CJ; Abumi K; Kaneda K; McAfee PC
    J Neurosurg; 2000 Oct; 93(2 Suppl):259-65. PubMed ID: 11012057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel lumbosacral axial fixation device.
    Ledet EH; Tymeson MP; Salerno S; Carl AL; Cragg A
    J Biomech Eng; 2005 Nov; 127(6):929-33. PubMed ID: 16438229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Segmental stability and compressive strength of posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants.
    Tsantrizos A; Baramki HG; Zeidman S; Steffen T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Aug; 25(15):1899-907. PubMed ID: 10908932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Schäfer J; Born C; Duda G; Haas NP; Mittlmeier T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(17):1850-7. PubMed ID: 11568693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages.
    Rapoff AJ; Ghanayem AJ; Zdeblick TA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Oct; 22(20):2375-9. PubMed ID: 9355218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A biomechanical comparison, including a new threaded cage.
    Brodke DS; Dick JC; Kunz DN; McCabe R; Zdeblick TA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jan; 22(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 9122778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro stabilizing effect of a transforaminal compared with two posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages.
    Kettler A; Schmoelz W; Kast E; Gottwald M; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Nov; 30(22):E665-70. PubMed ID: 16284577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
    Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
    Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using posterolateral placement of a single cylindrical threaded cage.
    Zhao J; Hai Y; Ordway NR; Park CK; Yuan HA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Feb; 25(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 10707386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
    Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of operative complications in a series of 471 anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures.
    Sasso RC; Best NM; Mummaneni PV; Reilly TM; Hussain SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Mar; 30(6):670-4. PubMed ID: 15770183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical analysis of biodegradable interbody fusion cages augmented With poly(propylene glycol-co-fumaric acid).
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Kleemann R; Duda G; Wise DL; Trantolo DJ; Lewandrowski KU
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Aug; 27(15):1644-51. PubMed ID: 12163726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical analysis of unilateral fixation with interbody cages.
    Chen HH; Cheung HH; Wang WK; Li A; Li KC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Feb; 30(4):E92-6. PubMed ID: 15706329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of PLIF cage size on lumbar spine stability.
    Goh JC; Wong HK; Thambyah A; Yu CS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jan; 25(1):35-9; discussion 40. PubMed ID: 10647158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical analysis of multilevel fixation methods in the lumbar spine.
    Glazer PA; Colliou O; Klisch SM; Bradfore DS; Bueff HU; Lotz JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jan; 22(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 9122797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical properties of threaded inserts for lumbar interbody spinal fusion.
    Tencer AF; Hampton D; Eddy S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Nov; 20(22):2408-14. PubMed ID: 8578391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation on the stability of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion cages under physiologic compressive preloads.
    Phillips FM; Cunningham B; Carandang G; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov L; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1731-6. PubMed ID: 15303015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical evaluation of anterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation.
    An HS; Lim TH; You JW; Hong JH; Eck J; McGrady L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Sep; 20(18):1979-83. PubMed ID: 8578371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.