These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11012823)

  • 21. Applications of direct detection device in transmission electron microscopy.
    Jin L; Milazzo AC; Kleinfelder S; Li S; Leblanc P; Duttweiler F; Bouwer JC; Peltier ST; Ellisman MH; Xuong NH
    J Struct Biol; 2008 Mar; 161(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 18054249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [An imaging system and computer processing of digital images from the Tesla BS500 transmission electron microscope].
    Vagunda V; Klíma J; Perina P
    Cesk Patol; 1998 Nov; 34(4):149-53. PubMed ID: 9929944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. JavaScope: A Web-based TEM control interface.
    Kisseberth N; Brauer G; Grosser B; Potter CS; Carragher B
    J Struct Biol; 1999; 125(2-3):229-34. PubMed ID: 10222279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing camera performance for quantitative microscopy.
    Lambert TJ; Waters JC
    Methods Cell Biol; 2014; 123():35-53. PubMed ID: 24974021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visibility of simulated microcalcifications--a hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems.
    Lai CJ; Shaw CC; Whitman GJ; Johnston DA; Yang WT; Selinko V; Arribas E; Dogan B; Kappadath SC
    Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):182-94. PubMed ID: 15719969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enhanced detection of normal retinal nerve-fiber striations using a charge-coupled device and digital filtering.
    Richards DW; Janesick JR; Elliot ST; Dingizian A; Velthuizen R; Wei Q; Clarke LP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1993 Oct; 231(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 8224936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom.
    Kroft LJ; Geleijns J; Mertens BJ; Veldkamp WJ; Zonderland HM; de Roos A
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Imaging thin films of nanoporous low-k dielectrics: comparison between ultramicrotomy and focused ion beam preparations for transmission electron microscopy.
    Thompson LE; Rice PM; Delenia E; Lee VY; Brock PJ; Magbitang TP; Dubois G; Volksen W; Miller RD; Kim HC
    Microsc Microanal; 2006 Apr; 12(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 17481352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital image capture applied to electron microscopic examination of renal biopsies.
    Killingsworth MC; Yong JL
    Pathology; 2002 Feb; 34(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 11902449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Charge-coupled device detector: performance considerations and potential for small-field mammographic imaging applications.
    Karellas A; Harris LJ; Liu H; Davis MA; D'Orsi CJ
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(4):1015-23. PubMed ID: 1518463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microwave and digital imaging technology reduce turnaround times for diagnostic electron microscopy.
    Giberson RT; Austin RL; Charlesworth J; Adamson G; Herrera GA
    Ultrastruct Pathol; 2003; 27(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 12775508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Virtual electron microscopy: a simple implementation creating a new paradigm in ultrastructural examination.
    Lee KC; Mak LS
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2011 Oct; 19(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 21903681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Small metal nanoparticle recognition using digital image analysis and high resolution electron microscopy.
    Flores AB; Robles LA; Arias MO; Ascencio JA
    Micron; 2003; 34(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 12801543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of the imaging properties of CCD-based devices used for small field digital mammography.
    Evans DS; Workman A; Payne M
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Jan; 47(1):117-35. PubMed ID: 11814221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recent advances in biological imaging.
    Saibil H; White N
    Biosci Rep; 1989 Aug; 9(4):437-49. PubMed ID: 2686775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The performance evaluation of direct detection electron energy-loss spectroscopy at 200 kV and 80 kV accelerating voltages.
    Cheng S; Pofelski A; Longo P; Twesten RD; Zhu Y; Botton GA
    Ultramicroscopy; 2020 May; 212():112942. PubMed ID: 32114314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of phase contrast transmission electron microscopy with optimized scanning transmission annular dark field imaging for protein imaging.
    Rez P
    Ultramicroscopy; 2003 Jul; 96(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 12623176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An image processing/stereological analysis system for transmission electron microscopy.
    Poole MC
    Microsc Res Tech; 1992 Jun; 21(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 1638049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.