These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11013604)

  • 1. Clinical assessment of the reliability of the examination (CARE).
    Straus SE; McAlister FA; Sackett DL
    ACP J Club; 2000; 133(2):A11-2. PubMed ID: 11013604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Skilled mentors" and reliability.
    Cibulka MT; Koldehoff RM
    Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1266; author reply 1267-8. PubMed ID: 12444885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beauty is in the eye of the examiner: reaching agreement about physical signs and their value.
    Joshua AM; Celermajer DS; Stockler MR
    Intern Med J; 2005 Mar; 35(3):178-87. PubMed ID: 15737139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Skilled mentors" and reliability.
    Olson KA
    Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1265-6; author reply 1267-8. PubMed ID: 12444884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical scores and clinical judgment].
    Housset B
    Rev Mal Respir; 2003 Apr; 20(2 Pt 1):177-9. PubMed ID: 12844013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Face validity and reliability of the first digital assessment scheme of pelvic floor muscle function conform the new standardized terminology of the International Continence Society.
    Slieker-ten Hove MC; Pool-Goudzwaard AL; Eijkemans MJ; Steegers-Theunissen RP; Burger CW; Vierhout ME
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 19090583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interrater reliability of the history and physical examination in patients with mechanical neck pain.
    Cleland JA; Childs JD; Fritz JM; Whitman JM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1388-95. PubMed ID: 17023251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Case study. Vaginal examinations in labour.
    Mandaza P; Nolan M
    Pract Midwife; 2001 Jun; 4(6):22. PubMed ID: 12026842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical commentary in response to: clinimetric evaluation of measurement tools used in hand therapy to assess activity and participation.
    Powell R; Wietlisbach C
    J Hand Ther; 2009; 22(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 19457637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of pediatric patients with abdominal pain.
    Yen K; Karpas A; Pinkerton HJ; Gorelick MH
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2005 Apr; 159(4):373-6. PubMed ID: 15809393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of clinical temporomandibular disorder diagnoses.
    John MT; Dworkin SF; Mancl LA
    Pain; 2005 Nov; 118(1-2):61-9. PubMed ID: 16154702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a content-valid standardized orthopedic assessment tool (SOAT).
    Lafave M; Katz L; Butterwick D
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Nov; 13(4):397-406. PubMed ID: 17203268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The Objective Structured Clinical Examination and its potential applications as an assessment and feedback tool for IDF primary care physicians--a pilot study].
    Castel OC; Shechter A; Amiel GE; Gilad D; Reis S
    Harefuah; 2006 Sep; 145(9):643-7, 704. PubMed ID: 17078422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In defense of King et al: the validity of manual examination in assessing patients with neck pain.
    Bogduk N
    Spine J; 2007; 7(6):749-52; author reply 752-3. PubMed ID: 17998135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing cardiac physical examination skills using simulation technology and real patients: a comparison study.
    Hatala R; Issenberg SB; Kassen B; Cole G; Bacchus CM; Scalese RJ
    Med Educ; 2008 Jun; 42(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 18221269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are bedside features of shock reproducible between different observers?
    Otieno H; Were E; Ahmed I; Charo E; Brent A; Maitland K
    Arch Dis Child; 2004 Oct; 89(10):977-9. PubMed ID: 15383446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The interexaminer reproducibility of physical examination of the cervical spine.
    Pool JJ; Hoving JL; de Vet HC; van Mameren H; Bouter LM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Feb; 27(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 14970808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of an occlusal and nonocclusal tooth wear grading system: clinical use versus dental cast assessment.
    Wetselaar P; Lobbezoo F; Koutris M; Visscher CM; Naeije M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):388-90. PubMed ID: 19639077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Value and limits of clinical examination to functional anorectal disorders (except for chronic anorectal pain)].
    De Parades V; Bauer P; Villet R; Atienza P
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2003 May; 27(5 Suppl):B87-98. PubMed ID: 12843942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of the Ely's test for assessing rectus femoris muscle flexibility and joint range of motion.
    Peeler J; Anderson JE
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Jun; 26(6):793-9. PubMed ID: 18186129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.