These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11016087)

  • 1. Mixed encounters, limited perception and optimal foraging.
    Berec L
    Bull Math Biol; 2000 Sep; 62(5):849-68. PubMed ID: 11016087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A mechanistic model for partial preferences.
    Berec L; Krivan V
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Dec; 58(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 11162787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should "handled" prey be considered? Some consequences for functional response, predator-prey dynamics and optimal foraging theory.
    Krivan V; Vrkoc I
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Mar; 227(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 14990381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bifurcation analysis of a predator-prey model with predators using hawk and dove tactics.
    Auger P; Kooi BW; Bravo de la Parra R; Poggiale JC
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Feb; 238(3):597-607. PubMed ID: 16122759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal foraging and predator-prey dynamics, II.
    Krivan V; Sikder A
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Apr; 55(2):111-26. PubMed ID: 10329511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impacts of foraging facilitation among predators on predator-prey dynamics.
    Berec L
    Bull Math Biol; 2010 Jan; 72(1):94-121. PubMed ID: 19697089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ratio- and predator-dependent functional forms for predators optimally foraging in patches.
    Anderson JJ
    Am Nat; 2010 Feb; 175(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 20028238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of vigilance on intraguild predation.
    Kimbrell T; Holt RD; Lundberg P
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(2):218-34. PubMed ID: 17888456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trait-mediated interactions: influence of prey size, density and experience.
    McCoy MW; Bolker BM
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 May; 77(3):478-86. PubMed ID: 18312336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model with foraging-predation risk trade-offs.
    Krivan V
    Am Nat; 2007 Nov; 170(5):771-82. PubMed ID: 17926298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolutionary dynamics of prey exploitation in a metapopulation of predators.
    Pels B; de Roos AM; Sabelis MW
    Am Nat; 2002 Feb; 159(2):172-89. PubMed ID: 18707412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A resolution of the paradox of enrichment.
    Mougi A; Nishimura K
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Sep; 248(1):194-201. PubMed ID: 17543997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual variation in prey choice in a predator-prey community.
    Okuyama T
    Theor Popul Biol; 2011 May; 79(3):64-9. PubMed ID: 21354194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of predator density dependent dispersal of prey on stability of a predator-prey system.
    Mchich R; Auger P; Poggiale JC
    Math Biosci; 2007 Apr; 206(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 16455112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Background evolution in camouflage systems: a predator-prey/pollinator-flower game.
    Abbott KR
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Feb; 262(4):662-78. PubMed ID: 19747925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Local spatial structure and predator-prey dynamics: counterintuitive effects of prey enrichment.
    Murrell DJ
    Am Nat; 2005 Sep; 166(3):354-67. PubMed ID: 16224690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical.
    Marples NM; Kelly DJ; Thomas RJ
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16136793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Plankton predation rates in turbulence: a study of the limitations imposed on a predator with a non-spherical field of sensory perception.
    Lewis DM; Bala SI
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Sep; 242(1):44-61. PubMed ID: 16542686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The positive effects of negative interactions: can avoidance of competitors or predators increase resource sampling by prey?
    Bell AV; Rader RB; Peck SL; Sih A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2009 Aug; 76(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19371755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators.
    Cosner C; DeAngelis DL; Ault JS; Olson DB
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Aug; 56(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 10438669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.