BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11016292)

  • 1. [No to patents for genetic diagnostics].
    Lundsteen C
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Jun; 162(25):3620-1. PubMed ID: 11016292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. American College of Medical Genetics position statement on gene patents and accessibility of gene testing.
    Genet Med; 1999; 1(5):237. PubMed ID: 11256680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patents to "treat me", no patents to "test me": an analysis of the 2009 Senate inquiry into gene patents.
    Triffett D
    J Law Med; 2010 May; 17(5):800-6. PubMed ID: 20552942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing time for gene patents.
    Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7291):957. PubMed ID: 20393513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Much ado about gene patents: the role of foreseeability.
    Gulliford MJ
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2004; 34(2):711-45. PubMed ID: 15115032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Data disclosure crucial after DNA patent verdict.
    de Costa A
    Science; 2013 Aug; 341(6149):959. PubMed ID: 23990544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Patents on genes--ethics going astray].
    Vigen T
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Aug; 119(19):2798. PubMed ID: 10494194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gene patents, health care policy and licensing schemes.
    Caulfield T; von Tigerstrom B
    Trends Biotechnol; 2006 Jun; 24(6):251-4. PubMed ID: 16621074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Diffuse rules on patent protection of genes. Scientists risk retroactive payment requirements].
    Orn P
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Nov; 97(46):5285-6. PubMed ID: 11116864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Introduction.
    Matthijs G; Aymé S
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 May; 16 Suppl 1():S1-2. PubMed ID: 18432280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Use of genetics in the Dutch health care system; a memorandum from the Dutch Minister of Health, Welfare and Sports to the Dutch Parliament].
    Leschot NJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jun; 145(26):1233-5. PubMed ID: 11455687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are human genes patentable?
    Sampson MJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2000; 30(4):4-5. PubMed ID: 10971884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patenting and licensing in genetic testing: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
    Aymé S; Matthijs G; Soini S;
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 May; 16 Suppl 1():S10-9. PubMed ID: 18432281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bioethics group finds "no objection" to human gene patents.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 1996 Oct; 383(6599):368. PubMed ID: 8837755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patients and patents.
    Cho MK; Merz JF
    Nature; 1997 Nov; 390(6657):221. PubMed ID: 9384365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A modest proposal to amend the Patent Code 35 U.S.C. Section 287(c) to allow health care providers to examine their patients' DNA.
    Minwalla S
    South Ill Univ Law J; 2002; 26(3):471-504. PubMed ID: 16485364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disease gene patenting: the clinician's dilemma.
    Magnus D
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(4):433-5. PubMed ID: 9752586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wrong fixes for gene patents.
    Dilenge T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 28(12):1242-3; author reply 1243. PubMed ID: 21139601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ethics of benefit sharing.
    Berg K
    Clin Genet; 2001 Apr; 59(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 11298678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patent or perish? An ethical approach to patenting human genes and proteins.
    Macer DR
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2002; 2(6):361-6. PubMed ID: 12629501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.