These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11016993)

  • 1. Uninformation and the choice paradox.
    McHughen A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Oct; 18(10):1018-9. PubMed ID: 11016993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Science-free GM good tests advance.
    Peerenboom E
    Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Aug; 16(8):712-3. PubMed ID: 9702761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Will genetically modified foods be allergenic?
    Taylor SL; Hefle SL
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 May; 107(5):765-71. PubMed ID: 11344340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proposed rules issued for bioengineered foods.
    Formanek R
    FDA Consum; 2001; 35(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 11444252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GM labeling in China beset by problems.
    Jia H
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):835-6. PubMed ID: 12894183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex, lies, and herbicides.
    della-Cioppa G; Callan M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):241. PubMed ID: 10700090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GM food singled out for labeling in the US.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):375. PubMed ID: 10748509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GM crops and equivocal environmental benefits.
    Johnson B; Hope A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):242. PubMed ID: 10700091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Special labeling requirements for genetically engineered food: how sound are the analytical frameworks used by FDA and food producers?
    Winn LB
    Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(4):667-88. PubMed ID: 11824460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lawsuit demands labels for modified foods.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1998 Jun; 393(6684):404. PubMed ID: 9623991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Bush administration deals a blow to biotechnology--and itself.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):807-8. PubMed ID: 11533629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New regulation for labeling genetically modified foods: a solution or a problem?
    Ramón D; Calvo MD; Peris J
    Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Oct; 16(10):889. PubMed ID: 9788327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
    Vasil IK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biosafety rules get thumbs up.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):253. PubMed ID: 10700125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A rational approach to labeling biotech-derived foods.
    Miller HI
    Science; 1999 May; 284(5419):1471-2. PubMed ID: 10383324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Europe angers US with strict GM labeling.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):6. PubMed ID: 12511897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. US, EU prepare for further biotech food dispute.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Oct; 19(10):897. PubMed ID: 11581641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Putting Cartagena into practice.
    Watanabe KN; Taeb M; Okusu H
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Oct; 22(10):1207-8. PubMed ID: 15470448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Italy employs further GMO delay tactics.
    Meldolesi A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Apr; 21(4):346. PubMed ID: 12665808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.