These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11018509)

  • 1. Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems.
    Evans JS; Handley SJ; Perham N; Over DE; Thompson VA
    Cognition; 2000 Dec; 77(3):197-213. PubMed ID: 11018509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Now you Bayes, now you don't: effects of set-problem and frequency-format mental representations on statistical reasoning.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1465-73. PubMed ID: 25711182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic causal reasoning with verbal information.
    Meder B; Mayrhofer R
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Aug; 96():54-84. PubMed ID: 28623726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asking better questions: How presentation formats influence information search.
    Wu CM; Meder B; Filimon F; Nelson JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1274-1297. PubMed ID: 28318286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers: The problem-wording effect on Bayesian reasoning.
    Sirota M; Navarrete G; Juanchich M
    Cognition; 2024 Apr; 245():105722. PubMed ID: 38309041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Within-subject consistency and between-subject variability in Bayesian reasoning strategies.
    Cohen AL; Staub A
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Sep; 81():26-47. PubMed ID: 26354671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing cognitive biases in probabilistic reasoning by the use of logarithm formats.
    Juslin P; Nilsson H; Winman A; Lindskog M
    Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):248-67. PubMed ID: 21640337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probability judgment in hierarchical learning: a conflict between predictiveness and coherence.
    Lagnado DA; Shanks DR
    Cognition; 2002 Feb; 83(1):81-112. PubMed ID: 11814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beliefs and Bayesian reasoning.
    Cohen AL; Sidlowski S; Staub A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):972-978. PubMed ID: 27604495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facilitating normative judgments of conditional probability: frequency or nested sets?
    Yamagishi K
    Exp Psychol; 2003; 50(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 12693194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measures of Bayesian Reasoning Performance on 'Normal' and 'Natural' Frequency Tasks.
    Stock R; Fisk JE; Montgomery C
    J Gen Psychol; 2016; 143(3):185-214. PubMed ID: 27410053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The probable and the possible at 12 months: intuitive reasoning about the uncertain future.
    Cesana-Arlotti N; Téglás E; Bonatti LL
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2012; 43():1-25. PubMed ID: 23205406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When does information about causal structure improve statistical reasoning?
    McNair S; Feeney A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):625-45. PubMed ID: 23931633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information.
    Ulph F; Townsend E; Glazebrook C
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2009 Jun; 9():26. PubMed ID: 19500337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Information Formats and Incidental Affect on Prior and Posterior Probability Judgments.
    Armstrong BA; Sparrow EP; Spaniol J
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Jul; 40(5):680-692. PubMed ID: 32659157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The psychology of good judgment: frequency formats and simple algorithms.
    Gigerenzer G
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 8818126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The format in which uncertainty information is presented affects decision biases.
    Gottlieb DA; Weiss T; Chapman GB
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Mar; 18(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 17444921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving Diagnostic Efficiency with Frequency Double-Trees and Frequency Nets in Bayesian Reasoning.
    Kunzelmann AK; Binder K; Fischer MR; Reincke M; Braun LT; Schmidmaier R
    MDM Policy Pract; 2022; 7(1):23814683221086623. PubMed ID: 35321028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probability Theory Plus Noise: Descriptive Estimation and Inferential Judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 10(1):192-208. PubMed ID: 29383882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are we good at detecting conflict during reasoning?
    Pennycook G; Fugelsang JA; Koehler DJ
    Cognition; 2012 Jul; 124(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 22575046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.