167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11018602)
1. A positive caver map response poorly predicts recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy.
Kim HL; Stoffel DS; Mhoon DA; Brendler CB
Urology; 2000 Oct; 56(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 11018602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the CaverMap device help preserve potency?
Kim HL; Mhoon DA; Brendler CB
Curr Urol Rep; 2001 Jun; 2(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 12084267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Nocturnal early erection as a parameter of postoperative organic erectile integrity].
Bannowsky A; Schulze H; van der Horst C; Stübinger JH; Portillo FJ; Jünemann KP
Urologe A; 2005 May; 44(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 15726311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy?
Marien TP; Lepor H
BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of first-generation Cavermap to verify location and function of cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional evaluation by experienced surgeons.
Walsh PC; Marschke P; Catalona WJ; Lepor H; Martin S; Myers RP; Steiner MS
Urology; 2001 Mar; 57(3):491-4. PubMed ID: 11248626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impacting factors for recovery of erectile function within 1 year following robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Ko WJ; Truesdale MD; Hruby GW; Landman J; Badani KK
J Sex Med; 2011 Jun; 8(6):1805-12. PubMed ID: 21426493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective comprehensive assessment of sexual function after retropubic non nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
Trinchieri A; Nicola M; Masini F; Mangiarotti B
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2005 Dec; 77(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 16444937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preserved postoperative penile size correlates well with maintained erectile function after bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Briganti A; Fabbri F; Salonia A; Gallina A; Chun FK; Dehò F; Zanni G; Suardi N; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):702-7. PubMed ID: 17418936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques.
Menon M; Kaul S; Bhandari A; Shrivastava A; Tewari A; Hemal A
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2291-6, discussion 2296. PubMed ID: 16280816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative nerve stimulation predicts postoperative potency.
Chang SS; Peterson M; Smith JA
Urology; 2001 Oct; 58(4):594-7. PubMed ID: 11597546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cavernous nerve reconstruction to preserve erectile function following non-nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: a prospective study.
Chang DW; Wood CG; Kroll SS; Youssef AA; Babaian RJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 111(3):1174-81. PubMed ID: 12621188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.
Zagaja GP; Mhoon DA; Aikens JE; Brendler CB
Urology; 2000 Oct; 56(4):631-4. PubMed ID: 11018620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of unilateral nerve sparing in radical perineal prostatectomy.
Brehmer B; Kirschner-Hermanns R; Donner A; Reineke T; Knüchel-Clarke R; Jakse G
Urol Int; 2005; 74(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 15897694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nightly vs on-demand sildenafil for penile rehabilitation after minimally invasive nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: results of a randomized double-blind trial with placebo.
Pavlovich CP; Levinson AW; Su LM; Mettee LZ; Feng Z; Bivalacqua TJ; Trock BJ
BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):844-51. PubMed ID: 23937708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neurostimulation during radical prostatectomy: improving nerve-sparing techniques.
Klotz L
Semin Urol Oncol; 2000 Feb; 18(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 10719931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of erectile function after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a single center.
Cathala N; Mombet A; Sanchez-Salas R; Rozet F; Barret E; Giuliano F; Galiano M; Prapotnich D; Kazzazi A; Djavan B; Jaffe J; Cathelineau X; Vallancien G
Can J Urol; 2012 Aug; 19(4):6328-35. PubMed ID: 22892254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized phase 3 study of intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy.
Klotz L; Heaton J; Jewett M; Chin J; Fleshner N; Goldenberg L; Gleave M
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1573-8. PubMed ID: 11025707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a different view.
Geary ES; Dendinger TE; Freiha FS; Stamey TA
J Urol; 1995 Jul; 154(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 7776409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy is quantitatively related to the response to intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation.
Rabbani F; Patel M; Cozzi P; Mulhall JP; Scardino PT
BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(9):1252-7. PubMed ID: 19338540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized phase II trial evaluation of erectile function after attempted unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy with versus without unilateral sural nerve grafting for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Davis JW; Chang DW; Chevray P; Wang R; Shen Y; Wen S; Pettaway CA; Pisters LL; Swanson DA; Madsen LT; Huber N; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ; Wood CG
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1135-43. PubMed ID: 18783876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
