These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11019405)

  • 1. The mammographer's role in addressing special needs.
    Kamm B
    Radiol Technol; 2000; 72(1):26-37; quiz 38-40. PubMed ID: 11019405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient outreach: the key role of mammographic technologies in mammogram compliance.
    Gunther R
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Mar; 10(3):35-8, 40. PubMed ID: 10110022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Magnetic resonance tomography in the diagnostics of breast implants: a survey].
    Hauth EA; Hoffmann O; Zadow-Eulerich T; Kimmig R; Forsting M
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2008; 48(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 18431047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The radiologic technologist's role in patient education.
    Dowd SB; Ott K
    Radiol Technol; 1998; 69(5):443-60; quiz 461-4. PubMed ID: 9606706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography.
    Klausz R; Shramchenko N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):369-74. PubMed ID: 15933139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of imaging in diagnosis of carcinoma of breast.
    Ahmed R; Ali SM
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Apr; 15(4):238-41. PubMed ID: 15857599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standing up to cancer's challenge.
    Reitherman RW
    Radiol Technol; 1992; 64(2):109-10. PubMed ID: 1438712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-related structural and functional changes in the breast: multimodality correlation with digital mammography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.
    Abramson RG; Mavi A; Cermik T; Basu S; Wehrli NE; Houseni M; Mishra S; Udupa J; Lakhani P; Maidment AD; Torigian DA; Alavi A
    Semin Nucl Med; 2007 May; 37(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 17418148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical application of multidetector row computed tomography in patient with breast cancer.
    Kang DK; Kim MJ; Jung YS; Yim H
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):583-98. PubMed ID: 18664847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Communicating with mammography patients.
    Kamm BL
    Radiol Technol; 2000; 71(3):247-64; quiz 266, 269-72. PubMed ID: 10665050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tailoring care to patients' needs.
    Goldstein L
    Radiol Technol; 1999; 70(3):299-300. PubMed ID: 10451722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic imaging of breast implants: role of MRI.
    Belli P; Romani M; Magistrelli A; Masetti R; Pastore G; Costantini M
    Rays; 2002; 27(4):259-77. PubMed ID: 12696289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informing patients of diagnostic mammography results: mammographer's opinions.
    Braeuning MP; Earp JL; O'Brien SM; Schell MJ; Denham AC; Pisano ED; O'Malley MS
    Acad Radiol; 2000 May; 7(5):335-40. PubMed ID: 10803613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mammography screening: presentation of scientific evidence as a basis for communication with women].
    Mühlhauser I; Höldke B
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Oct; 94(9):721-31. PubMed ID: 11127779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast Density: Assessment, Cancer Risk, and Reporting Regulations.
    Paterson E; Havrda JB
    Radiol Technol; 2020 Mar; 91(4):361M-375M. PubMed ID: 32102870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - Clinical results.
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Marten K; Kehbel S; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):696-9. PubMed ID: 12063597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging of the patient with silicone gel breast implants.
    Piccoli CW
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2001 May; 9(2):393-408, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 11493428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The radiographer and the well-woman.
    McClellan M
    Radiogr Today; 1990 Sep; 56(640):26. PubMed ID: 2242230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.