These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11019622)

  • 1. Selective attention to the chemosensory modality.
    Spence C; Kettenmann B; Kobal G; McGlone FP
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Aug; 62(6):1265-71. PubMed ID: 11019622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shared attentional resources for processing visual and chemosensory information.
    Spence C; Kettenmann B; Kobal G; McGlone FP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):775-83. PubMed ID: 11548034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective attention to pain: a psychophysical investigation.
    Spence C; Bentley DE; Phillips N; McGlone FP; Jones AK
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Aug; 145(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 12136389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On measuring selective attention to an expected sensory modality.
    Spence C; Driver J
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Apr; 59(3):389-403. PubMed ID: 9136269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attention to olfaction. A psychophysical investigation.
    Spence C; McGlone FP; Kettenmann B; Kobal G
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Jun; 138(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 11465740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.
    Turatto M; Galfano G; Bridgeman B; Umiltà C
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 14658019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crossmodal and intermodal attention modulate event-related brain potentials to tactile and auditory stimuli.
    Hötting K; Rösler F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 148(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 12478394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision.
    Spence C; Nicholls ME; Gillespie N; Driver J
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 May; 60(4):544-57. PubMed ID: 9628989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.
    Van Damme S; Gallace A; Spence C; Crombez G; Moseley GL
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():100-6. PubMed ID: 19094970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.
    Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Sturm W; Willmes K; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():67-76. PubMed ID: 25577489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task.
    Jones A; Forster B
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a cross-modal manipulation of attention on somatosensory cortical neuronal responses to tactile stimuli in the monkey.
    Meftah el-M; Shenasa J; Chapman CE
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Dec; 88(6):3133-49. PubMed ID: 12466436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task.
    Miles E; Poliakoff E; Brown RJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial coordinate systems for tactile spatial attention depend on developmental vision: evidence from event-related potentials in sighted and congenitally blind adult humans.
    Röder B; Föcker J; Hötting K; Spence C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 28(3):475-83. PubMed ID: 18702719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reflexive spatial orienting of tactile attention.
    Spence C; McGlone FP
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 141(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 11715076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating the nature and time-course of the modality shift effect between vision and touch.
    Miles E; Brown R; Poliakoff E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):871-88. PubMed ID: 20931419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inhibition of return is supramodal: a demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition.
    Spence C; Lloyd D; McGlone F; Nicholls ME; Driver J
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Sep; 134(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 11026724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect.
    Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.