These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Accuracy of an automated refractor using a Hartmann-Shack sensor after corneal refractive surgery and cataract surgery. Park JH; Kim MJ; Park JH; Song IS; Kim JY; Tchah H J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1889-97. PubMed ID: 26603398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new wavefront sensor with polar symmetry: quantitative comparisons with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor. Carvalho LA; Castro J; Chamon W; Schor P J Refract Surg; 2006 Nov; 22(9):954-8. PubMed ID: 17124896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A quick method for analyzing Hartmann-Shack patterns: application to refractive surgery. Hamam H J Refract Surg; 2000; 16(5):S636-42. PubMed ID: 11019889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of wavefront sensing devices. Solomon KD; Fernández de Castro LE; Sandoval HP; Vroman DT Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2004 Jun; 17(2):119-27, v. PubMed ID: 15207555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aberrometry: the past, present, and future of optometry. Thibos LN; Applegate RA; Marcos S Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jan; 80(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12553538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Principles of Tscherning aberrometry. Mrochen M; Kaemmerer M; Mierdel P; Krinke HE; Seiler T J Refract Surg; 2000; 16(5):S570-1. PubMed ID: 11019875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of refractive error measurements in adults with Z-View aberrometer, Humphrey autorefractor, and subjective refraction. Cooper J; Citek K; Feldman JM Optometry; 2011 Apr; 82(4):231-40. PubMed ID: 21439490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of monochromatic ocular aberrations measured with an objective cross-cylinder aberroscope and a Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Hong X; Thibos LN; Bradley A; Woods RL; Applegate RA Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jan; 80(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 12553540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of autorefractor performance. Sachdev N; Cairns G; McGhee CN Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):9; author reply 9-10. PubMed ID: 15630398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Aberrometry: clinical and research applications. Applegate RA; Marcos S; Thibos LN Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Feb; 80(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 12597322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A new calibration set of phase plates for ocular aberrometers. Rodríguez P; Navarro R; Arines J; Bará S J Refract Surg; 2006 Mar; 22(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 16602317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design and validation of a scanning Shack Hartmann aberrometer for measurements of the eye over a wide field of view. Wei X; Thibos L Opt Express; 2010 Jan; 18(2):1134-43. PubMed ID: 20173936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Data quality and clinical decision-making: do we trust machines blindly? Pesudovs K; Applegate RA Clin Exp Optom; 2009 May; 92(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 19453557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reply to Richard Symes. Kunavisarut P Eye (Lond); 2013 Jun; 27(6):779. PubMed ID: 23579413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement and comparison of the optical performance of an ophthalmic lens based on a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor in real viewing conditions. Zhou C; Wang W; Yang K; Chai X; Ren Q Appl Opt; 2008 Dec; 47(34):6434-41. PubMed ID: 19037372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]