These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11019893)

  • 1. Report from the VSIA taskforce on standards for reporting optical aberrations of the eye.
    Thibos LN; Applegate RA; Schwiegerling JT; Webb R
    J Refract Surg; 2000; 16(5):S654-5. PubMed ID: 11019893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes.
    Thibos LN; Applegate RA; Schwiegerling JT; Webb R;
    J Refract Surg; 2002; 18(5):S652-60. PubMed ID: 12361175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reference axis selection: subcommittee report of the OSA Working Group to establish standards for measurement and reporting of optical aberrations of the eye.
    Applegate RA; Thibos LN; Bradley A; Marcos S; Roorda A; Salmon TO; Atchison DA
    J Refract Surg; 2000; 16(5):S656-8. PubMed ID: 11019894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is the appropriate gold standard test for refractive error?
    Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):115-117. PubMed ID: 28211178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. American Glaucoma Society Position Statement: electronic data standards for clinical practice.
    Boland MV; Schuman JS; Mattox CG;
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Feb; 22(2):174-5. PubMed ID: 21946554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recent advances in measurement of monochromatic aberrations of human eyes.
    Atchison DA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2005 Jan; 88(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 15658922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Opinion of the German Ophthalmological Society and the Professional Association of German Ophthalmologists regarding the use of imaging to analyze the optic nerve head in glaucoma : July 2016].
    ;
    Ophthalmologe; 2016 Sep; 113(9):752-3. PubMed ID: 27572951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Macular illumination tests in various refractive states of the eye.
    Paul SD; Singh K
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 1971 Sep; 19(3):102-7. PubMed ID: 15744979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Principles of Tscherning aberrometry.
    Mrochen M; Kaemmerer M; Mierdel P; Krinke HE; Seiler T
    J Refract Surg; 2000; 16(5):S570-1. PubMed ID: 11019875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management of Irvine-Gass syndrome.
    Kodjikian L; Bellocq D; Bodaghi B
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Nov; 40(9):788-792. PubMed ID: 28987449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [8th Annual Session of the Society for Ophthalmology of Sachsen-Anhalt and Thürigia (SATh8), Magdeburg, 16 October 1999. Refractive surgery and free subjects].
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999; 215 Suppl 7():1-10. PubMed ID: 10635514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Special commentary: Food and Drug Administration and American Glaucoma Society co-sponsored workshop: the validity, reliability, and usability of glaucoma imaging devices.
    Meier KL; Greenfield DS; Hilmantel G; Kahook MY; Lin C; Rorer EM; Singh K; Tarver ME; Weinreb RN; Eydelman MB; Liebmann JM
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Nov; 121(11):2116-23. PubMed ID: 25085628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Traditional versus computer-assisted refraction: "which is better?".
    Borish IM; Catania LJ
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):749-56. PubMed ID: 9635380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical experience with the Tscherning aberrometer.
    Kaemmerer M; Mrochen M; Mierdel P; Krinke HE; Seiler T
    J Refract Surg; 2000; 16(5):S584-7. PubMed ID: 11019879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of autorefractor performance.
    Sachdev N; Cairns G; McGhee CN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):9; author reply 9-10. PubMed ID: 15630398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding refraction and accommodation through "retinal imaging" aberrometry: a case report.
    Krueger RR; Mrochen M; Kaemmerer M; Seiler T
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Apr; 108(4):674-8. PubMed ID: 11297482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical ocular wavefront analyzers.
    Cerviño A; Hosking SL; Montes-Mico R; Bates K
    J Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 23(6):603-16. PubMed ID: 17598581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Objective determination of refraction].
    Friedburg D
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87 Suppl():S138-41. PubMed ID: 2083892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Control and consideration of wavefront aberrometers.
    Montés-Micó R; Muñoz G; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 May; 30(5):942. PubMed ID: 15130619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.