111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11020178)
21. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation.
Adunka OF; Buss E; Clark MS; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
Laryngoscope; 2008 Nov; 118(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 18813141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Auditory brainstem implant (ABI): new frontiers in adults and children.
Colletti V; Carner M; Miorelli V; Guida M; Colletti L; Fiorino F
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Jul; 133(1):126-38. PubMed ID: 16025066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Audiological application criteria for implantable hearing aid devices: a clinical experience at the Nijmegen ORL clinic.
Verhaegen VJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Snik AF
Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18677283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Analysis of factors effecting satisfaction of cochlear implants in prelingually deafened adolescents].
Liu S; Han DM; Zhao XT; Deng ZF; Wu X; Kong Y; Chen XQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 85(10):693-6. PubMed ID: 15932735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
Kasturi K; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cochlear implants and hearing aids: some personal and professional reflections.
Ross M
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2008; 45(5):xvii-xxii. PubMed ID: 18816420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The Mayo Clinic experience with the cochlear implant.
Facer GW; Peterson A; Brey RH; Marion M; Cevette M; Balko K; Green JD; Rose D; Pool A
Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):149-52, 154-5. PubMed ID: 8205975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of implantation age on visual attention skills.
Yucel E; Derim D
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 72(6):869-77. PubMed ID: 18395272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cochlear implants in post-lingually deafened patients.
Hiraumi H; Tsuji J; Kanemaru S; Fujino K; Ito J
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):17-21. PubMed ID: 17453437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cochlear implantation in a patient with profound hearing loss with the A1555G mitochondrial mutation.
Tono T; Ushisako Y; Kiyomizu K; Usami S; Abe S; Shinkawa H; Komune S
Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):754-7. PubMed ID: 9831149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cochlear implant surgery in patients more than seventy-nine years old.
Eshraghi AA; Rodriguez M; Balkany TJ; Telischi FF; Angeli S; Hodges AV; Adil E
Laryngoscope; 2009 Jun; 119(6):1180-3. PubMed ID: 19301411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cochlear implantation in patients with auditory neuropathy of varied etiologies.
Mason JC; De Michele A; Stevens C; Ruth RA; Hashisaki GT
Laryngoscope; 2003 Jan; 113(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12514381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.
Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 18465410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults.
Francis HW; Chee N; Yeagle J; Cheng A; Niparko JK
Laryngoscope; 2002 Aug; 112(8 Pt 1):1482-8. PubMed ID: 12172266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of cochlear implant technology in sequentially bilaterally implanted adults.
Budenz CL; Roland JT; Babb J; Baxter P; Waltzman SB
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):731-5. PubMed ID: 19638940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
