These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11020830)

  • 1. Full-field direct digital telemammography: technical components, study protocols, and preliminary results.
    Lou SL; Sickles EA; Huang HK; Hoogstrate D; Cao F; Wang J; Jahangiri M
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 1997 Dec; 1(4):270-8. PubMed ID: 11020830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
    Sheybani EO; Sankar R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preliminary clinical evaluation of a high-resolution telemammography system.
    Maitz GS; Chang TS; Sumkin JH; Wintz PW; Johns CM; Ganott M; Holbert BL; Hakim CM; Harris KM; Gur D; Herron JM
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Apr; 32(4):236-40. PubMed ID: 9101359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of low-cost telemammography screening configurations: a comparison with film-screen readings in vulnerable areas.
    Salazar AJ; Romero J; Bernal O; Moreno A; Velasco S; Díaz X
    J Digit Imaging; 2014 Oct; 27(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 24802372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts.
    Del Turco MR; Mantellini P; Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Martinelli F; Lazzari B; Houssami N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):860-6. PubMed ID: 17885057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic breast region extraction from digital mammograms for PACS and telemammography applications.
    Lou SL; Lin HD; Lin KP; Hoogstrate D
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2000; 24(4):205-20. PubMed ID: 10842045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multisite telemammography system for remote management of screening mammography: an assessment of technical, operational, and clinical issues.
    Leader JK; Hakim CM; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Wallace LP; Clearfield RJ; Perrin RL; Drescher JM; Maitz GS; Sumkin JH; Gur D
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 16710798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Soft copy versus hard copy findings in digital mammography].
    Funke M; Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 12063733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current status of digital mammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1996 Oct; 17(5):424-43. PubMed ID: 8896109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Full-field digital mammography].
    Bick U
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):957-64. PubMed ID: 11199437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection and characterization of simulated small masses.
    Yang WT; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Murphy WA; Dryden MJ; Kushwaha AC; Sahin AA; Johnston D; Dempsey PJ; Shaw CC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):W576-81. PubMed ID: 17114508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
    Van Ongeval Ch
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study.
    Skaane P; Young K; Skjennald A
    Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):877-84. PubMed ID: 14576447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Clinical results of digital mammography].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Bautz W
    Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15744483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program.
    Séradour B; Heid P; Estève J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 24370149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital mammography.
    D'Orsi CJ
    Curr Womens Health Rep; 2002 Apr; 2(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 12116601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital mammography: a review of technical development and clinical applications.
    Shah AJ; Wang J; Yamada T; Fajardo LL
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2003 Apr; 4(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12744760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.