137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11020830)
1. Full-field direct digital telemammography: technical components, study protocols, and preliminary results.
Lou SL; Sickles EA; Huang HK; Hoogstrate D; Cao F; Wang J; Jahangiri M
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 1997 Dec; 1(4):270-8. PubMed ID: 11020830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
Sheybani EO; Sankar R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preliminary clinical evaluation of a high-resolution telemammography system.
Maitz GS; Chang TS; Sumkin JH; Wintz PW; Johns CM; Ganott M; Holbert BL; Hakim CM; Harris KM; Gur D; Herron JM
Invest Radiol; 1997 Apr; 32(4):236-40. PubMed ID: 9101359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of low-cost telemammography screening configurations: a comparison with film-screen readings in vulnerable areas.
Salazar AJ; Romero J; Bernal O; Moreno A; Velasco S; Díaz X
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Oct; 27(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 24802372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts.
Del Turco MR; Mantellini P; Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Martinelli F; Lazzari B; Houssami N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):860-6. PubMed ID: 17885057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic breast region extraction from digital mammograms for PACS and telemammography applications.
Lou SL; Lin HD; Lin KP; Hoogstrate D
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2000; 24(4):205-20. PubMed ID: 10842045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A multisite telemammography system for remote management of screening mammography: an assessment of technical, operational, and clinical issues.
Leader JK; Hakim CM; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Wallace LP; Clearfield RJ; Perrin RL; Drescher JM; Maitz GS; Sumkin JH; Gur D
J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 16710798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Soft copy versus hard copy findings in digital mammography].
Funke M; Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Fischer U; Grabbe E
Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 12063733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current status of digital mammography.
Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1996 Oct; 17(5):424-43. PubMed ID: 8896109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Full-field digital mammography].
Bick U
Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):957-64. PubMed ID: 11199437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection and characterization of simulated small masses.
Yang WT; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Murphy WA; Dryden MJ; Kushwaha AC; Sahin AA; Johnston D; Dempsey PJ; Shaw CC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):W576-81. PubMed ID: 17114508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
Van Ongeval Ch
JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study.
Skaane P; Young K; Skjennald A
Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):877-84. PubMed ID: 14576447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical results of digital mammography].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Bautz W
Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15744483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program.
Séradour B; Heid P; Estève J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 24370149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital mammography.
D'Orsi CJ
Curr Womens Health Rep; 2002 Apr; 2(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 12116601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital mammography: a review of technical development and clinical applications.
Shah AJ; Wang J; Yamada T; Fajardo LL
Clin Breast Cancer; 2003 Apr; 4(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12744760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
