These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 110210)

  • 1. Reconstruction of the audiogram using brain stem responses and high-pass noise masking.
    Don M; Eggermont JJ; Brackmann DE
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1979; (3 Pt 2 Suppl 57):1-20. PubMed ID: 110210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Derived acoustically evoked brainstem responses by means of narrow-band and notched-noise masking in normal-hearing subjects.
    Thümmler I; Tietze G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 6463552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Derived brain stem responses by means of pure-tone masking.
    Pantev C; Pantev M
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 7178798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to clicks masked by notched noise.
    van Zanten GA; Brocaar MP
    Audiology; 1984; 23(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 6732630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survey of attempts to use auditory evoked potentials to obtain an audiogram. Review article.
    Sohmer H; Kinarti R
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Nov; 18(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 6395931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-frequency auditory brainstem response threshold.
    Laukli E; Fjermedal O; Mair IW
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 3206183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-pass and notch noise masking in suprathreshold brainstem response audiometry.
    Laukli E
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 6612212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone-conduction masking for threshold assessment in auditory brain stem response testing.
    Webb KC; Greenberg HJ
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 6628853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in humans using high-pass noise masking. II. Effect of click intensity.
    Eggermont JJ; Don M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1671-5. PubMed ID: 7462466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in man unsing high-pass noise masking.
    Don M; Eggermont JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Apr; 63(4):1084-92. PubMed ID: 649867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory brain stem potentials evoked by clicks in notch-filtered masking noise: audiological relevance.
    Pratt H; Ben-Yitzhak E; Attias J
    Audiology; 1984; 23(4):380-7. PubMed ID: 6466201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem response threshold elicited by clicks masked with 1590-Hz high-pass noise in subjects with sloping cochlear hearing losses.
    Conijn EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):272-83. PubMed ID: 1449430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 15599194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency-specific contributions to the auditory brain stem response derived by means of pure-tone masking.
    Pantev C; Lagidze S; Pantev M; Kevanishvili Z
    Audiology; 1985; 24(4):275-87. PubMed ID: 4051877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. IV. Interaural latency differences (wave V) in cochlear hearing loss.
    Rosenhamer HJ; Lindström B; Lundborg T
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 7280543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Background noise in rooms used for pure-tone audiometry in disability assessment.
    Robinson DW
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Feb; 26(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 1586848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem responses in the cat.
    Mair IW; Laukli E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1985; 99(3-4):377-83. PubMed ID: 4013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain-stem responses when masking with wide-band and high-pass filtered noise.
    Thümmler I; Tietze G; Matkei P
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7323676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.