These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11021036)

  • 1. The effect of divided attention on memory for items and their context.
    Troyer AK; Craik FI
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2000 Sep; 54(3):161-71. PubMed ID: 11021036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Source memory and divided attention: reciprocal costs to primary and secondary tasks.
    Troyer AK; Winocur G; Craik FI; Moscovitch M
    Neuropsychology; 1999 Oct; 13(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 10527055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual implicit memory requires attentional encoding.
    Crabb BT; Dark VJ
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Mar; 27(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 10226437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brain regions associated with successful and unsuccessful retrieval of verbal episodic memory as revealed by divided attention.
    Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M; Ziegler M; Grady C
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1115-27. PubMed ID: 15817169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: the attentional boost effect in implicit memory.
    Spataro P; Mulligan NW; Rossi-Arnaud C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1223-31. PubMed ID: 23356238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are attentional resources a mediator for sex differences in memory?
    Seçer I; Yılmazoğulları Y
    Int J Psychol; 2016 Apr; 51(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 25451245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: further support for an asymmetry.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Guez J; Dori H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Sep; 24(5):1091-104. PubMed ID: 9747524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fractionation of the component processes underlying successful episodic encoding: a combined fMRI and divided-attention study.
    Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 18275332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of semantically related distractors during encoding and retrieval of words in long-term memory.
    Meade ME; Fernandes MA
    Memory; 2016 Jul; 24(6):801-11. PubMed ID: 26277934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.
    Weeks JC; Hasher L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 27900585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention and the acquisition of new knowledge: their effects on older adults' associative memory deficit.
    Cooper CM; Odegard TN
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Dec; 26(4):890-9. PubMed ID: 21639643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.
    Craik FI; Govoni R; Naveh-Benjamin M; Anderson ND
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1996 Jun; 125(2):159-80. PubMed ID: 8683192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What neural correlates underlie successful encoding and retrieval? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study using a divided attention paradigm.
    Kensinger EA; Clarke RJ; Corkin S
    J Neurosci; 2003 Mar; 23(6):2407-15. PubMed ID: 12657700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of attention in remembering important item-location associations.
    Siegel ALM; Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1248-1262. PubMed ID: 29926393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of divided attention on encoding and retrieval in episodic memory revealed by positron emission tomography.
    Iidaka T; Anderson ND; Kapur S; Cabeza R; Craik FI
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Mar; 12(2):267-80. PubMed ID: 10771411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: the resiliency of retrieval processes.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Perretta JG; Tonev ST
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):609-25. PubMed ID: 10994220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: assessment of attentional costs and a componential analysis.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Guez J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1461-82. PubMed ID: 11185777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual task demands on encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from healthy adult ageing.
    Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Cooper J
    Cortex; 2007 Jan; 43(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17334215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time perception and temporal order memory.
    Brown SW; Smith-Petersen GA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():173-80. PubMed ID: 24594383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of divided attention on encoding- and retrieval-related brain activity: A PET study of younger and older adults.
    Anderson ND; Iidaka T; Cabeza R; Kapur S; McIntosh AR; Craik FI
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Sep; 12(5):775-92. PubMed ID: 11054920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.