These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11021387)

  • 1. Primary placement of a titanium motility post in a porous polyethylene orbital implant: animal model with quantitative assessment of fibrovascular ingrowth and vascular density.
    Hsu WC; Green JP; Spilker MH; Rubin PA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 16(5):370-9. PubMed ID: 11021387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medpor Motility Coupling Post: a rabbit model.
    Choi JC; Iwamoto MA; Bstandig S; Rubin PA; Shore JW
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 May; 15(3):190-201. PubMed ID: 10355838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of early fibrovascular proliferation according to orbital implant in orbital floor fracture reconstruction.
    Lee H; Baek S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1518-23. PubMed ID: 22976649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of experimental porous silicone implants and porous silicone implants.
    Son J; Kim CS; Yang J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 250(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 22202952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fibrovascularization of porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implant in a rabbit model.
    Jordan DR; Brownstein S; Dorey M; Yuen VH; Gilberg S
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Mar; 20(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 15083083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Late porous polyethylene implant exposure after motility coupling post placement.
    Cheng MS; Liao SL; Lin LL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 138(3):420-4. PubMed ID: 15364224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of synthetic bone glass particulate on the fibrovascularization of porous polyethylene orbital implants.
    Choi HY; Lee JE; Park HJ; Oum BS
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 16550057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rate of vascularization and exposure of silicone-capped porous polyethylene spherical implants: an animal model.
    Kalwerisky K; Mihora L; Czyz CN; Foster JA; Holck DE
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013; 29(5):350-6. PubMed ID: 23811596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quasi-integrated porous polyethylene orbital implant.
    Anderson RL; Yen MT; Lucci LM; Caruso RT
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jan; 18(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 11910325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anophthalmic socket implant.
    Karesh JW; Dresner SC
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Oct; 101(10):1688-95; discussion 1695-6. PubMed ID: 7936568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants.
    Rubin PA; Popham JK; Bilyk JR; Shore JW
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Jun; 10(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 7522048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on fibrovascular ingrowth into porous polyethylene anophthalmic socket implants.
    Park WC; Han SK; Kim NJ; Chung TY; Khwarg SI
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2005 Mar; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15929480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary placement of a motility coupling post in porous polyethylene orbital implants.
    Rubin PA; Fay AM; Remulla HD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2000 Jun; 118(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 10865322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orbital implants insertion to improve ocular prostheses motility.
    Goiato MC; Haddad MF; dos Santos DM; Pesqueira AA; Ribeiro Pdo P; Moreno A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):870-5. PubMed ID: 20485072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Free orbital fat graft to prevent porous polyethylene orbital implant exposure in patients with retinoblastoma.
    Kim NJ; Choung HK; Khwarg SI; Yu YS
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Jul; 21(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 16052135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging assessment of porous polyethylene orbital implant (Medpor).
    De Potter P; Duprez T; Cosnard G
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1656-60. PubMed ID: 10964823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetically integrated microporous implant: safety and efficacy of secondary posting.
    Escalona-Benz E; Benz MS; Murray TG; Hayden BC; Hernandez E; Garonzik SN; Cicciarelli NL
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Nov; 121(11):1596-600. PubMed ID: 14609918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance evaluation of fibrovascular ingrowth into porous polyethylene orbital implant.
    Park SW; Seol HY; Hong SJ; Kim KA; Choi JC; Cha IH
    Clin Imaging; 2003; 27(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 14585562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design of a magnetically integrated microporous implant.
    Murray TG; Cicciarelli NL; Croft BH; Garonzik S; Voigt M; Hernandez E
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2000 Sep; 118(9):1259-62. PubMed ID: 10980772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the exposure rate of wrapped hydroxyapatite (Bio-Eye) versus unwrapped porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implants in enucleated patients.
    Tabatabaee Z; Mazloumi M; Rajabi MT; Khalilzadeh O; Kassaee A; Moghimi S; Eftekhar H; Goldberg RA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011; 27(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 20829725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.