These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1102142)
21. [Clinical and coronarographic comparisons in ischemic heart disease]. Losev RZ; Gavrilov VA Klin Med (Mosk); 1980 Nov; 58(11):45-9. PubMed ID: 7453116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Intravenous DSA of the heart: functional studies of the left ventricle in coronary heart disease at rest and following stress]. Christ F; Franken T; Nitsch J; Becher H Z Kardiol; 1986 May; 75(5):256-66. PubMed ID: 3526732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? White CW; Wright CB; Doty DB; Hiratza LF; Eastham CL; Harrison DG; Marcus ML N Engl J Med; 1984 Mar; 310(13):819-24. PubMed ID: 6700670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method. Mancini GB; Simon SB; McGillem MJ; LeFree MT; Friedman HZ; Vogel RA Circulation; 1987 Feb; 75(2):452-60. PubMed ID: 3802448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vivo angiographic pathoanatomy of the acute syndromes of coronary heart disease. Herman MV; Gorlin R Trans Assoc Am Physicians; 1972; 85():231-47. PubMed ID: 4660009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Clinical application of image processing system and quantitative analysis of left ventriculogram and coronary arteriogram]. Dai R Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 1991 Apr; 19(2):85-8, 124. PubMed ID: 1879318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The reliability of coronary angiogram interpretation: an angiographic-pathologic correlation with a comparison of radiographic views. Murphy ML; Galbraith JE; de Soyza N Am Heart J; 1979 May; 97(5):578-84. PubMed ID: 433732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Inter-observer reliability in the interpretation of coronary angiograms. Chocron S; Etievent JP; Dussaucy A; Viel JF; Clement F; Alwan K; Neidhardt M; Schipman N Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1996; 10(8):671-5. PubMed ID: 8875177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical utility of two-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in detecting coronary artery disease. Post JC; van Rossum AC; Hofman MB; de Cock CC; Valk J; Visser CA Eur Heart J; 1997 Mar; 18(3):426-33. PubMed ID: 9076379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Unstable angina pectoris: indication for coronary angiography]. Sigwart U Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1981 Jun; 111(26):988-91. PubMed ID: 7268354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prospective evaluation of coronary arteries: influence on operative risk in coronary artery surgery. Corbineau H; Lebreton H; Langanay T; Logeais Y; Leguerrier A Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Oct; 16(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 10571090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Subtle left ventricular asynergy with completely obstructed coronary arteries. Leighton RF; Nelson AD; Brewster P Am J Cardiol; 1983 Oct; 52(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 6624660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Selective coronary angiography in patients with conduction disturbances of the heart. Lewis BS; Gotsman MS Eur J Cardiol; 1978 Jan; 6(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 624317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Left ventricular function in patients with and without myocardial infarction and one, two or three vessel coronary artery disease. Moraski RE; Russell RO; Smith MK; Rackley CE Am J Cardiol; 1975 Jan; 35(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 1109238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]