BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11021699)

  • 1. Analytical versus voxelized phantom representation for Monte Carlo simulation in radiological imaging.
    Peter J; Tornai MP; Jaszczek RJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 May; 19(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 11021699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DukeSim: A Realistic, Rapid, and Scanner-Specific Simulation Framework in Computed Tomography.
    Abadi E; Harrawood B; Sharma S; Kapadia A; Segars WP; Samei E
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2019 Jun; 38(6):1457-1465. PubMed ID: 30561344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mesh modeling of system geometry and anatomy phantoms for realistic GATE simulations and their inclusion in SPECT reconstruction.
    Auer B; Könik A; Fromme TJ; De Beenhouwer J; Kalluri KS; Lindsay C; Furenlid LR; Kuo PH; King MA
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Mar; 68(7):. PubMed ID: 36808915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a method for projection-based tissue-activity estimation within small volumes of interest.
    Southekal S; McQuaid SJ; Kijewski MF; Moore SC
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):685-701. PubMed ID: 22241591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical characterization of the linear attenuation coefficient in polychromatic CT scans.
    Vegas G; San José Estépar R
    Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5568-5581. PubMed ID: 32654155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. gPET: a GPU-based, accurate and efficient Monte Carlo simulation tool for PET.
    Lai Y; Zhong Y; Chalise A; Shao Y; Jin M; Jia X; Chi Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 64(24):245002. PubMed ID: 31711051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. XCIST-an open access x-ray/CT simulation toolkit.
    Wu M; FitzGerald P; Zhang J; Segars WP; Yu H; Xu Y; De Man B
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Sep; 67(19):. PubMed ID: 36096127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital reference objects for evaluating algorithm performance in MR image formation.
    Wülker C; Gessert NT; Doneva M; Kastryulin S; Ercan E; Nielsen T
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jan; 105():67-74. PubMed ID: 37925111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface-based anthropomorphic bone structures for use in high-resolution simulated medical imaging.
    Sauer TJ; McCabe C; Abadi E; Samei E; Segars WP
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Dec; 69(1):. PubMed ID: 38052093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrieval of chromophore concentration changes in a digital human head model using analytical mean partial pathlengths of photons.
    Vera DA; García HA; Carbone NA; Waks-Serra MV; Iriarte DI; Pomarico JA
    J Biomed Opt; 2024 Feb; 29(2):025004. PubMed ID: 38419755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo evaluation of object shape effects in iodine-131 SPET tumor activity quantification.
    Dewaraja YK; Ljungberg M; Koral KF
    Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 28(7):900-6. PubMed ID: 11504087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generation of voxelized breast phantoms from surgical mastectomy specimens.
    O'Connor JM; Das M; Dider CS; Mahd M; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041915. PubMed ID: 23556909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MCAT to XCAT: The Evolution of 4-D Computerized Phantoms for Imaging Research: Computer models that take account of body movements promise to provide evaluation and improvement of medical imaging devices and technology.
    Paul Segars W; Tsui BM
    Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng; 2009 Dec; 97(12):1954-1968. PubMed ID: 26472880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reconstruction of emission tomography data using origin ensembles.
    Sitek A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Apr; 30(4):946-56. PubMed ID: 21147594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foam-like phantoms for comparing tomography algorithms.
    Pelt DM; Hendriksen AA; Batenburg KJ
    J Synchrotron Radiat; 2022 Jan; 29(Pt 1):254-265. PubMed ID: 34985443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Method for comparison of data driven gating algorithms in emission tomography.
    Reymann MP; Vija AH; Maier A
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Sep; 68(18):. PubMed ID: 37619585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3-D Stochastic Numerical Breast Phantoms for Enabling Virtual Imaging Trials of Ultrasound Computed Tomography.
    Li F; Villa U; Park S; Anastasio MA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 Jan; 69(1):135-146. PubMed ID: 34520354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of analytical models of diffuse reflectance in homogeneous biological tissues: Gelatin-based phantoms and Monte Carlo experiments.
    Bahl A; Segaud S; Xie Y; Shapey J; Bergholt MS; Vercauteren T
    J Biophotonics; 2024 Jun; 17(6):e202300536. PubMed ID: 38616109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodology to create 3D models of COVID-19 pathologies for virtual clinical trials.
    Rodríguez Pérez S; Coolen J; Marshall NW; Cockmartin L; Biebaû C; Desmet J; De Wever W; Struelens L; Bosmans H
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2021 Jan; 8(Suppl 1):013501. PubMed ID: 33447646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of observer performance in unknown-location tasks for tomographic image reconstruction.
    Yendiki A; Fessler JA
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Dec; 24(12):B99-B109. PubMed ID: 18059919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.