BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11022405)

  • 1. Cervical cancer in Kentucky.
    Friedell GH; Ross FE; Tucker TC; Cook CC; Doering DL; Hilgers R; Milburn CS; Pursell SH; Spires SE; Hinton M; Sorrell C; Edwards MJ
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2000 Sep; 98(9):398-405. PubMed ID: 11022405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Geographic & age variations in invasive cervical cancer in Kentucky, 1995-1999.
    Wyatt S; Ross FE; Bottorff D; Lancaster M
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2002 Oct; 100(10):441-6. PubMed ID: 12395746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patterns of cervical cancer risk in Kentucky.
    Hopenhayn C; Tucker T; Christian A; Christian WJ
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2007 May; 105(5):205-8. PubMed ID: 17566462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Systematic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix (epidemiologic aspects)].
    Campion J; Flamant R
    Bull Inst Natl Sante Rech Med; 1966; 21(5):977-94. PubMed ID: 5976404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Incidence of cervical cancer 5 years after mass screening in the community of Medvesćak].
    Juras N; Tućan V; Pirkić A; Sućur A
    Acta Med Iugosl; 1984; 38(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 6496168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Detection of cervical cancer at the Bell Telephone Company of Canada (1965-1969)].
    Audet-Lapointe P
    Union Med Can; 1972 Dec; 101(12):2713-6. PubMed ID: 4661704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cancer of the cervix--problems and challenge of the 3rd millennium.
    Chowdhury NN
    J Indian Med Assoc; 2000 Feb; 98(2):39-40. PubMed ID: 11016147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cervical cancer screening].
    Delaloye JF; De Grandi P
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):589-91. PubMed ID: 9340712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A comparison between mass screening for uterine neck cancer in the Districts of Frederiksberg and Maribo].
    Koch F; Klinken L; Albrechtsen R
    Nord Med; 1971 Dec; 86(50):1534. PubMed ID: 5135061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Participation in highly subsidized cervical cancer screening by women in Enugu, South-east Nigeria.
    Obi SN; Ozumba BC; Nwokocha AR; Waboso PA
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 27(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17464818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Results of the epidemiologic survey for the detection of cervical cancer in women of Lakavec and surroundings].
    Petrović M; Krajinović S; Udicki S; Petrović L; Radovanović Z; Vlajinac H; Ducić S
    Nar Zdrav; 1971 Sep; 27(9):332-5. PubMed ID: 5155792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Differences in cervical cancer mass screening results in Greater-Helsinki area].
    Nieminen P; Tarkkanen J; Timonen T; Meyer B; Hakama M; Anttila A
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2489-96. PubMed ID: 12053343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Critique of cytology as a mass-screening method].
    Pflanz M
    Fortschr Med; 1974 Mar; 92(9):351-2 passim. PubMed ID: 4819501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Efficacy of organized screening in comparison to spontaneous Pap samples in the prevention of invasive cervical cancer].
    Kallio M; Nieminen P; Anttila A; Hakama M
    Duodecim; 2001; 117(14):1442-6. PubMed ID: 12181953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved prognosis for cervical cancers due to comprehensive screening.
    Macgregor JE; Fraser ME; Mann EM
    Acta Cytol; 1972; 16(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 4501868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Epidemiology of cancer of the cervix uteri (author's transl)].
    Sachs H; Hasche C
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1974 Nov; 34(11):921-30. PubMed ID: 4435345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of cervical cancer in a women's prison.
    Audet-Lapointe P
    Can Med Assoc J; 1971 Mar; 104(6):509-11. PubMed ID: 5549991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pathways to diagnosis of cervical cancer: screening history, delay in follow up, and smear reading.
    Priest P; Sadler L; Peters J; Crengle S; Bethwaite P; Medley G; Jackson R
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 17166215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.