These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1102563)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Uni-Yeast-Tek kit for the identification of medically important yeasts.
    Bowman PI; Ahearn DG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Oct; 2(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 1102563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Milan EP; Malheiros ES; Fischman O; Colombo AL
    Mycopathologia; 1997; 137(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 9368409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a modified dye pour-plate auxanographic method for the rapid identification of clinically significant yeasts. Comparison with two commercial systems.
    Weymann LH; Stager CE; Qadri SG; Villarreal A; Qadri SM
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1979 Mar; 167(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 375051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of two commercialized systems for the rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Quindós G; Lipperheide V; Pontón J
    Mycoses; 1993; 36(9-10):299-303. PubMed ID: 8015561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ability of RapID Yeast Plus System to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours.
    Kitch TT; Jacobs MR; McGinnis MR; Appelbaum PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 May; 34(5):1069-71. PubMed ID: 8727877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of four commercial biochemical test systems for identification of yeasts.
    Bergan T; Hollum AB; Vangdal M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 1(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6756911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the new API Candida system to the ID 32C system for identification of clinically important yeast species.
    Fricker-Hidalgo H; Vandapel O; Duchesne MA; Mazoyer MA; Monget D; Lardy B; Lebeau B; Freney J; Ambroise-Thomas P; Grillot R
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jul; 34(7):1846-8. PubMed ID: 8784609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of YeastIdent and Uni-Yeast-Tek yeast identification systems.
    Salkin IF; Land GA; Hurd NJ; Goldson PR; McGinnis MR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Apr; 25(4):624-7. PubMed ID: 3571470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Salkin IF; Schadow KH; Bankaitis LA; McGinnis MR; Kemna ME
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 3900130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experience with the MicroSeq D2 large-subunit ribosomal DNA sequencing kit for identification of commonly encountered, clinically important yeast species.
    Hall L; Wohlfiel S; Roberts GD
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Nov; 41(11):5099-102. PubMed ID: 14605145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
    Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of clinical yeast isolates by using the Microring YT.
    McGowan KL; Mortensen JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 8432801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of rapid testing methods for enzyme production with the germ tube method for presumptive identification of Candida albicans.
    Heelan JS; Siliezar D; Coon K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Nov; 34(11):2847-9. PubMed ID: 8897198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CHROMagar Candida, a new differential isolation medium for presumptive identification of clinically important Candida species.
    Odds FC; Bernaerts R
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Aug; 32(8):1923-9. PubMed ID: 7989544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of the Uni-Yeast-Tek system for rapid presumptive identification of medically important yeasts.
    Cooper BH; Johnson JB; Thaxton ES
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Apr; 7(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 357442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of the Iatron serological Candida check kit and the API 20C kit for identification of medically important Candida species.
    Shinoda T; Kaufman L; Padhye AA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 7016900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid identification of yeasts by semi-automated and conventional methods.
    Qadri SM; Flournoy DJ; Qadri SG; Ramirez EG
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1986; 175(5):307-16. PubMed ID: 3762492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Oblack DL; Rhodes JC; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of mass spectrometry for the identification of clinically interesting yeasts].
    Galán F; García-Agudo L; Guerrero I; Marín P; García-Tapia A; García-Martos P; Rodríguez-Iglesias M
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2015; 33(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 25444360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.