These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1102563)
21. Internal transcribed spacer sequencing versus biochemical profiling for identification of medically important yeasts. Ciardo DE; Schär G; Böttger EC; Altwegg M; Bosshard PP J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jan; 44(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 16390952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of the new Mycotube test-kit for yeast identification. Guinet RM Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Feb; 4(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 3886377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Rapid differentiation and presumptive identificaiton of yeasts using Candida CHROM-agar medium]. Giusiano GE; Mangiaterra ML Rev Argent Microbiol; 1998; 30(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 9744038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of Autobac 1 for rapid assimilation testing of Candida and Torulopsis species. Ngui Yen JH; Smith JA J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Feb; 7(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 344333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Rapid identification of Candida species and other clinically important yeast species by flow cytometry. Page BT; Kurtzman CP J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 43(9):4507-14. PubMed ID: 16145099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Species identification of invasive yeasts including Candida in Pakistan: limitations of phenotypic methods. Farooqi J; Jabeen K; Saeed N; Zafar A; Brandt ME; Hasan R J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Oct; 62(10):995-8. PubMed ID: 23866432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Identification of medically important Candida and non-Candida yeast species by an oligonucleotide array. Leaw SN; Chang HC; Barton R; Bouchara JP; Chang TC J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Jul; 45(7):2220-9. PubMed ID: 17507521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of analytical methods for the numerical taxonomy of yeasts. Jones GR J Gen Microbiol; 1975 Jul; 89(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 1097592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of commercial systems for the identification of clinical yeast isolates. Bowman PI; Ahearn DG J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Jul; 4(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 956362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficacy of Chromogenic Candida Agar for isolation and presumptive identification of pathogenic yeast species. Ghelardi E; Pichierri G; Castagna B; Barnini S; Tavanti A; Campa M Clin Microbiol Infect; 2008 Feb; 14(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 17986267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of six commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts. Buchaille L; Freydière AM; Guinet R; Gille Y Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Jul; 17(7):479-88. PubMed ID: 9764550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Direct identification and recognition of yeast species from clinical material by using albicans ID and CHROMagar Candida plates. Baumgartner C; Freydiere AM; Gille Y J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Feb; 34(2):454-6. PubMed ID: 8789038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the API Candida system with the AUXACOLOR system for identification of common yeast pathogens. Campbell CK; Davey KG; Holmes AD; Szekely A; Warnock DW J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 37(3):821-3. PubMed ID: 9986865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis for the identification of mixed oral yeasts in human saliva. Weerasekera MM; Sissons CH; Wong L; Anderson S; Holmes AR; Cannon RD J Med Microbiol; 2013 Feb; 62(Pt 2):319-330. PubMed ID: 23065546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of three differential media for the presumptive identification of yeasts. Yucesoy M; Ozbek OA; Marol S Clin Microbiol Infect; 2005 Mar; 11(3):245-7. PubMed ID: 15715727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of the API 20 c microtube system for the identification of clinically important yeasts. Roberts GD; Wang HS; Hollick GE J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Mar; 3(3):302-5. PubMed ID: 1270593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for the identification of medically-important yeasts in the clinical laboratories of Dijon and Lille hospitals. Sendid B; Ducoroy P; François N; Lucchi G; Spinali S; Vagner O; Damiens S; Bonnin A; Poulain D; Dalle F Med Mycol; 2013 Jan; 51(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 22703164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Collaborative evaluation of the Abbott yeast identification system. Cooper BH; Prowant S; Alexander B; Brunson DH J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):853-6. PubMed ID: 6381526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Molecular identification of unusual pathogenic yeast isolates by large ribosomal subunit gene sequencing: 2 years of experience at the United kingdom mycology reference laboratory. Linton CJ; Borman AM; Cheung G; Holmes AD; Szekely A; Palmer MD; Bridge PD; Campbell CK; Johnson EM J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):1152-8. PubMed ID: 17251397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of the BD Phoenix system for identification of a wide spectrum of clinically important yeast species: a comparison with Vitek 2-YST. Won EJ; Shin JH; Kim MN; Choi MJ; Joo MY; Kee SJ; Shin MG; Suh SP; Ryang DW Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2014 Aug; 79(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 24952986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]